The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees
Open accessAbstract
Despite the widespread assumption that the learning abilities of animals are adapted to the particular environments in which they operate, the quantitative effects of learning performance on fitness remain virtually unknown. Here, we evaluate the learning performance of bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris) from multiple colonies in an ecologically relevant associative learning task under laboratory conditions, before testing the foraging performance of the same colonies under the field conditions. We demonstrate that variation in learning speed among bumble-bee colonies is directly correlated with the foraging performance, a robust fitness measure, under natural conditions. Colonies vary in learning speed by a factor of nearly five, with the slowest learning colonies collecting 40% less nectar than the fastest learning colonies. Such a steep fitness function is suggestive of strong selection for higher learning speed. Partial correlation analysis reveals that other factors such as forager body size or colour preference appear to be negligible in our study. Although our study does not directly prove causality of learning on foraging success, our approach of correlating natural within-species variation in these two factors represents a major advance over traditional between-species correlative analyses where comparability can be compromised by the fact that species vary along multiple dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Gallistel, C. R. (1990) · Cited by 2,571
Cognition, evolution, and behavior
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5652 · Cited by 1,457
Velthuis, H. H. W., & van Doorn, A. (2006) · Apidologie · doi:10.1051/apido:2006019 · Cited by 959
Recognition of flowers by pollinators
Chittka, L., & Raine, N. E. (2006) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.002 · Cited by 494
Self-citationEcological and Evolutionary Aspects of Learning in Phytophagous Insects
Papaj, D. R., & Prokopy, R. J. (1989) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001531 · Cited by 485
Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy
Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., Bock, F., & Dornhaus, A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/424388a · Cited by 416
Self-citationPlight of the bumble bee: Pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations
Colla, S. R., Otterstatter, M. C., Gegear, R. J., & Thomson, J. D. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.013 · Cited by 373
Cognitive ecology: The evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making
(1998) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(98)90220-6 · Cited by 363
Evolutionary Biology of Animal Cognition
Dukas, R. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130152 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making
Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., & Raine, N. E. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010 · Cited by 637
Self-citationChittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.023 · Cited by 598
Self-citationVariation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18
“Bees, flies, and butterflies can alter their innate color preference by learning an association between nectar or pollen reward and a trait such as color (Goulson, Cruise, Sparrow, & Harris, 2007; Gumbert, 2000; Raine & Chittka, 2008; Weiss, 1997).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Raine, N. E., & Chittka, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-01-15
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 1636
- Pages
- 803-808
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2159821805
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2007.1652
- The paper
- Raine, N. E., & Chittka, L. (2008). The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.