Cited by 637Animal Behavior and ReproductionDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making

Chittka, Lars, Skorupski, Peter, Raine, Nigel E.·2009·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

The traditional emphasis when measuring performance in animal cognition has been overwhelmingly on accuracy, independent of decision time. However, more recently, it has become clear that tradeoffs exist between decision speed and accuracy in many ecologically relevant tasks, for example, prey and predator detection and identification; pollinators choosing between flower species; and spatial exploration strategies. Obtaining high-quality information often increases sampling time, especially under noisy conditions. Here we discuss the mechanisms generating such speed-accuracy tradeoffs, their implications for animal decision making (including signalling, communication and mate choice) and the significance of differences in decision strategies among species, populations and individuals. The ecological relevance of such tradeoffs can be better understood by considering the neuronal mechanisms underlying decision-making processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rapid information flows may overwhelm cognitive processes and yield less accurate decisions.

    “rapid information flows may overwhelm cognitive processes and yield less accurate decisions”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [103]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., & Raine, N. E.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
400-407
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109284574
Cited by
637
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 32
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F52765X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
speed-accuracy trade-off, animal decision-making, decision time, animal cognition, prey detection, predator detection, pollinator foraging behavior, spatial exploration, signaling, communication, mate choice
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Decision Making, Feeding Behavior, Models, Biological, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review