The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds?
Open accessAbstract
Among vertebrates, the sense of smell is mediated by olfactory receptors (ORs) expressed in sensory neurons within the olfactory epithelium. Comparative genomic studies suggest that the olfactory acuity of mammalian species correlates positively with both the total number and the proportion of functional OR genes encoded in their genomes. In contrast to mammals, avian olfaction is poorly understood, with birds widely regarded as relying primarily on visual and auditory inputs. Here, we show that in nine bird species from seven orders (blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus ; black coucal, Centropus grillii ; brown kiwi, Apteryx australis ; canary, Serinus canaria ; galah, Eolophus roseicapillus ; red jungle fowl, Gallus gallus ; kakapo, Strigops habroptilus ; mallard, Anas platyrhynchos ; snow petrel, Pagodroma nivea ), the majority of amplified OR sequences are predicted to be from potentially functional genes. This finding is somewhat surprising as one previous report suggested that the majority of OR genes in an avian (red jungle fowl) genomic sequence are non-functional pseudogenes. We also show that it is not the estimated proportion of potentially functional OR genes, but rather the estimated total number of OR genes that correlates positively with relative olfactory bulb size, an anatomical correlate of olfactory capability. We further demonstrate that all the nine bird genomes examined encode OR genes belonging to a large gene clade, termed γ-c, the expansion of which appears to be a shared characteristic of class Aves. In summary, our findings suggest that olfaction in birds may be a more important sense than generally believed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Roper, T. J. (1999) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60219-3 · Cited by 210
Cited by
MACSE: Multiple Alignment of Coding SEquences Accounting for Frameshifts and Stop Codons
Ranwez, V., Harispe, S., Delsuc, F., & Douzery, E. J. P. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022594 · Cited by 718
The evolution of animal chemosensory receptor gene repertoires: roles of chance and necessity
Nei, M., Niimura, Y., & Nozawa, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2480 · Cited by 621
Ground tit genome reveals avian adaptation to living at high altitudes in the Tibetan plateau
Qu, Y., Zhao, H., Han, N., Zhou, G., Song, G., Gao, B., Tian, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Meng, X., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3071 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiger, S. S., Fidler, A. E., Valcu, M., & Kempenaers, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-07-15
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 1649
- Pages
- 2309-2317
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2134818788
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2008.0607
- The paper
- Steiger, S. S., Fidler, A. E., Valcu, M., & Kempenaers, B. (2008). Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.