Cited by 72Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The Late Permian herbivore Suminia and the early evolution of arboreality in terrestrial vertebrate ecosystems

Open access
Fröbisch, Jörg, Reisz, Robert R.·2009·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Vertebrates have repeatedly filled and partitioned the terrestrial ecosystem, and have been able to occupy new, previously unexplored habitats throughout their history on land. The arboreal ecospace is particularly important in vertebrate evolution because it provides new food resources and protection from large ground-dwelling predators. We investigated the skeletal anatomy of the Late Permian (approx. 260 Ma) herbivorous synapsid Suminia getmanovi and performed a morphometric analysis of the phalangeal proportions of a great variety of extant and extinct terrestrial and arboreal tetrapods to discern locomotor function and habitat preference in fossil taxa, with special reference to Suminia . The postcranial anatomy of Suminia provides the earliest skeletal evidence for prehensile abilities and arboreality in vertebrates, as indicated by its elongate limbs, intrinsic phalangeal proportions, a divergent first digit and potentially prehensile tail. The morphometric analysis further suggests a differentiation between grasping and clinging morphotypes among arboreal vertebrates, the former displaying elongated proximal phalanges and the latter showing an elongation of the penultimate phalanges. The fossil assemblage that includes Suminia demonstrates that arboreality and resource partitioning occurred shortly after the initial establishment of the modern type of terrestrial vertebrate ecosystems, with a large number of primary consumers and few top predators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2009.0911

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fröbisch, J., & Reisz, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Field Museum of Natural History (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Fröbisch, Jörg
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-07-29
Volume
276
Issue
1673
Pages
3611-3618
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2167309688
Cited by
72
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
Late Permian, arboreality, prehensile tail, skeletal morphology, synapsids, tetrapod locomotion, resource partitioning, habitat preference, vertebrate evolution, limb lengthening
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Biological Evolution, Feeding Behavior, Forelimb, Fossils, Reptiles, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review