Cited by 212Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate

Open access
Holveck, Marie-Jeanne, Riebel, Katharina·2010·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Mate choice studies routinely assume female preferences for indicators of high quality in males but rarely consider developmental causes of within-population variation in mating preferences. By contrast, recent mate choice models assume that costs and benefits of searching or competing for high-quality males depend on females' phenotypic quality. A prediction following from these models is that manipulation of female quality should alter her choosiness or even the direction of her mating preferences. We here provide (to our knowledge) the first example where an experimental manipulation of female quality induced a mating preference for low-quality males. Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) reared in small or large experimental broods became high- or low-quality adults, respectively. Only high-quality females preferred high-quality males' mate-advertising songs, while all low-quality females preferred low-quality males' song. Subsequent breeding trials confirmed this pattern: latency until egg laying was shortest in quality-matched pairs, indicating that quality-matched birds were accepted faster as partners. Females produced larger eggs when mated with high-quality males, regardless of their own quality, indicating consensus regarding male quality despite the expression of different choices. Our results demonstrate the importance of considering the development of mating preferences to understand their within-population variation and environmentally induced change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2009.1222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 212

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00534.x · DOI
  2. 10.1515/9780691207278 · DOI
  3. Baumel J. J., 1979, Nomina anatomica avium: an annotated anatomical dictionary of birds.
  4. Becker W. A., 1984, Manual of quantitative genetics
  5. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1251 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/284493 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/284877 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.017 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1533220100 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S1464793101005784 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.022 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/6019 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/anbe.1996.0073 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/beheco/arg075 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03444.x · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0580 · DOI
  17. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3520 · DOI
  18. Härdling R., 2005, The evolution of prudent choice, Evol. Ecol. Res., 7, 697
  19. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.08.016 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/beheco/arn078 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0006323196005014 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s002650050315 · DOI
  23. 10.1006/anbe.2001.1843 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/4087240 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1327 · DOI
  26. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0374 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90172-6 · DOI
  28. 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0277 · DOI
  29. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2673 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89123-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0054 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/35012605 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/285259 · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1320 · DOI
  35. 10.1163/157075603769700304 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40006-8 · DOI
  37. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1930 · DOI
  38. Riebel K., Experimental manipulations of the rearing environment influence adult female zebra finch song preferences, Anim. Behav.
  39. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0207 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01953-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60308-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0705290104 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01656.x · DOI
  44. 10.1093/beheco/arl036 · DOI
  45. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0496 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature02645 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Zann R. A., 1996, The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies, 10.1093/oso/9780198540793.001.0001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Holveck, M.-J., & Riebel, K.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Holveck, Marie-Jeanne
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-10-07
Volume
277
Issue
1678
Pages
153-160
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2117144473
Cited by
212
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
19.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
mate choice, female quality, female choosiness, zebra finch, egg size, brood size, intrapopulation variation, female-female competition
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Female, Male, Phenotype, Vocalization, Animal, Linear Models, Finches, Mating Preference, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2009.1222
The paper
Holveck, M.-J., & Riebel, K. (2010). Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1222