The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata
Open accessAbstract
While a unique origin of the euarthropods is well established, relationships between the four euarthropod classes—chelicerates, myriapods, crustaceans and hexapods—are less clear. Unsolved questions include the position of myriapods, the monophyletic origin of chelicerates, and the validity of the close relationship of euarthropods to tardigrades and onychophorans. Morphology predicts that myriapods, insects and crustaceans form a monophyletic group, the Mandibulata, which has been contradicted by many molecular studies that support an alternative Myriochelata hypothesis (Myriapoda plus Chelicerata). Because of the conflicting insights from published molecular datasets, evidence from nuclear-coding genes needs corroboration from independent data to define the relationships among major nodes in the euarthropod tree. Here, we address this issue by analysing two independent molecular datasets: a phylogenomic dataset of 198 protein-coding genes including new sequences for myriapods, and novel microRNA complements sampled from all major arthropod lineages. Our phylogenomic analyses strongly support Mandibulata, and show that Myriochelata is a tree-reconstruction artefact caused by saturation and long-branch attraction. The analysis of the microRNA dataset corroborates the Mandibulata, showing that the microRNAs miR-965 and miR-282 are present and expressed in all mandibulate species sampled, but not in the chelicerates. Mandibulata is further supported by the phylogenetic analysis of a comprehensive morphological dataset covering living and fossil arthropods, and including recently proposed, putative apomorphies of Myriochelata. Our phylogenomic analyses also provide strong support for the inclusion of pycnogonids in a monophyletic Chelicerata, a paraphyletic Cycloneuralia, and a common origin of Arthropoda (tardigrades, onychophorans and arthropods), suggesting that previous phylogenies grouping tardigrades and nematodes may also have been subject to tree-reconstruction artefacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life
Dunn, C. W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D. Q., Pang, K., Browne, W. E., Smith, S. A., Seaver, E., Rouse, G. W., Obst, M., Edgecombe, G. D., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06614 · Cited by 1,921
Self-citationAssessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods
Hejnol, A., Obst, M., Stamatakis, A., Ott, M., Rouse, G. W., Edgecombe, G. D., Martinez, P., Baguñà, J., Bailly, X., Jondelius, U., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 · Cited by 747
Self-citationPhilippe, H., Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Lartillot, N. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130205 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.2243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07890 · DOI
- Nielsen C., 1995, Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla
- 10.1038/376123a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/33577 · DOI
- Dohle W., 2001, Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of a proper name ‘Tetraconata’ for the monophyletic unit Crustacea + Hexapoda, Ann. Soc. Entomol. France, 37, 85
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00222-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-2-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/376165a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35093090 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.2236 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08742 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.0950 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/icj020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.033 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026166 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msi111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10635150802570791 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00423.x · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msh112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00123.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2008.00302.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0015 · DOI
- Janssen R.& Budd G. E.. 2010 Gene expression suggests conserved aspects of Hox gene regulation in arthropods and provides additional support for monophyletic Myriapoda. EvoDevo . (doi:10.1186/2041-9139-1-4). · DOI
- 10.1007/s00427-006-0085-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/35093097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature03984 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-7-284 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/gbe/evq030 · DOI
- 10.1078/0044-5231-00039 · DOI
- Richter S., 2004, Kontroversen in der phylogenetischen systematik der Metazoa., 73
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.027 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06138 · DOI
- Telford M. J., 2003, The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 47, 479
Cited by
Erwin, D. H., Laflamme, M., Tweedt, S. M., Sperling, E. A., Pisani, D., & Peterson, K. J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206375 · Cited by 1,336
Self-citationRota-Stabelli, O., Daley, A. C., & Pisani, D. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.026 · Cited by 360
Self-citationImpact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets
Roure, B., Baurain, D., & Philippe, H. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss208 · Cited by 365
Self-citationConstraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history
Benton, M., Donoghue, P., Vinther, J., Asher, R., Friedman, M., & Near, T. (2015) · Palaeontologia Electronica · doi:10.26879/424 · Cited by 284
A Phylogenomic Solution to the Origin of Insects by Resolving Crustacean-Hexapod Relationships
Schwentner, M., Combosch, D. J., Pakes Nelson, J., & Giribet, G. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.040 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Rota-Stabelli, O., Campbell, L., Brinkmann, H., Edgecombe, G. D., Longhorn, S. J., Peterson, K. J., Pisani, D., Philippe, H., & Telford, M. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-08-11
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 1703
- Pages
- 298-306
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2096256651
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2010.0590
- The paper
- Rota-Stabelli, O., Campbell, L., Brinkmann, H., Edgecombe, G. D., Longhorn, S. J., Peterson, K. J., Pisani, D., Philippe, H., & Telford, M. J. (2011). A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.