The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus)
Open accessAbstract
Genealogical data are an important source of evidence for delimiting species, yet few statistical methods are available for calculating the probabilities associated with different species delimitations. Bayesian species delimitation uses reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (rjMCMC) in conjunction with a user-specified guide tree to estimate the posterior distribution for species delimitation models containing different numbers of species. We apply Bayesian species delimitation to investigate the speciation history of forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus) from tropical West Africa using five nuclear loci (and mtDNA) for 51 specimens representing 10 populations. We find that species diversity in H. fasciatus is currently underestimated, and describe three new species to reflect the most conservative estimate for the number of species in this complex. We examine the impact of the guide tree, and the prior distributions on ancestral population sizes (θ) and root age (τ0), on the posterior probabilities for species delimitation. Mis-specification of the guide tree or the prior distribution for θ can result in strong support for models containing more species. We describe a new statistic for summarizing the posterior distribution of species delimitation models, called speciation probabilities, which summarize the posterior support for each speciation event on the starting guide tree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913022107 · Cited by 1,405
Hey, J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp298 · Cited by 238
Cited by
How to fail at species delimitation
Carstens, B. C., Pelletier, T. A., Reid, N. M., & Satler, J. D. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12413 · Cited by 1,248
Coalescent-based species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy
Fujita, M. K., Leaché, A. D., Burbrink, F. T., McGuire, J. A., & Moritz, C. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.012 · Cited by 893
Self-citationThe BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation
Yang, Z. (2015) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/61.5.854 · Cited by 772
Unguided Species Delimitation Using DNA Sequence Data from Multiple Loci
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu279 · Cited by 566
Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST
Drummond, A. J., & Bouckaert, R. R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139095112 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Leaché, A. D., & Fujita, M. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-06-02
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 1697
- Pages
- 3071-3077
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2170706978
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2010.0662
- The paper
- Leaché, A. D., & Fujita, M. K. (2010). Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.