Cited by 125Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFire effects on ecosystems

Niche construction and Dreaming logic: aboriginal patch mosaic burning and varanid lizards ( Varanus gouldii ) in Australia

Open access
Bird, Rebecca Bliege, Tayor, Nyalangka, Codding, Brian F., Bird, Douglas W.·2013·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Anthropogenic fire is a form of ecosystem engineering that creates greater landscape patchiness at small spatial scales: such rescaling of patch diversity through mosaic burning has been argued to be a form of niche construction, the loss of which may have precipitated the decline and extinction of many endemic species in the Western Desert of Australia. We find evidence to support this hypothesis relative to one keystone species, the sand monitor lizard ( Varanus gouldii ). Paradoxically, V. gouldii populations are higher where Aboriginal hunting is most intense. This effect is driven by an increase in V. gouldii densities near successional edges, which is higher in landscapes that experience extensive human burning. Over time, the positive effects of patch mosaic burning while hunting overwhelm the negative effects of predation in recently burned areas to produce overall positive impacts on lizard populations. These results offer critical insights into the maintenance of animal communities in the desert, supporting the hypothesis that the current high rate of endemic species decline among small animals may be linked to the interaction between invasive species and mid-century removal of Aboriginal niche construction through hunting and patch mosaic burning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2013.2297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 125

Authors
Bird, R. B., Tayor, N., Codding, B. F., & Bird, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Parnngurr Community, via Newman, WA 6754, USA
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Bird, Rebecca Bliege
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2013-12-07
Volume
280
Issue
1772
Pages
20132297
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2152372755
Cited by
125
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
niche construction, Aboriginal burning, Varanus gouldii, ecosystem engineering, anthropogenic fire, predation, Western Desert, invasive species, landscape patchiness, keystone species
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fires, Humans, Human Activities, Lizards, Population Density, Western Australia, Ecosystem, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Biota, Introduced Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review