Niche construction and Dreaming logic: aboriginal patch mosaic burning and varanid lizards ( Varanus gouldii ) in Australia
Open accessAbstract
Anthropogenic fire is a form of ecosystem engineering that creates greater landscape patchiness at small spatial scales: such rescaling of patch diversity through mosaic burning has been argued to be a form of niche construction, the loss of which may have precipitated the decline and extinction of many endemic species in the Western Desert of Australia. We find evidence to support this hypothesis relative to one keystone species, the sand monitor lizard ( Varanus gouldii ). Paradoxically, V. gouldii populations are higher where Aboriginal hunting is most intense. This effect is driven by an increase in V. gouldii densities near successional edges, which is higher in landscapes that experience extensive human burning. Over time, the positive effects of patch mosaic burning while hunting overwhelm the negative effects of predation in recently burned areas to produce overall positive impacts on lizard populations. These results offer critical insights into the maintenance of animal communities in the desert, supporting the hypothesis that the current high rate of endemic species decline among small animals may be linked to the interaction between invasive species and mid-century removal of Aboriginal niche construction through hunting and patch mosaic burning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no universal 'hunter-gatherer' use of fire.
“Ethnographic (13,59,60) and ethnological research (7, 22, 23, 26, 61) makes clear that there is no universal”
From Indigenous impacts on North American Great Plains fire regimes of the past millennium (2018) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Bird, R. B., Tayor, N., Codding, B. F., & Bird, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Parnngurr Community, via Newman, WA 6754, USA
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bird, Rebecca Bliege
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2013-12-07
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 1772
- Pages
- 20132297
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC3813344
- OpenAlex
- W2152372755
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Keywords
- niche construction, Aboriginal burning, Varanus gouldii, ecosystem engineering, anthropogenic fire, predation, Western Desert, invasive species, landscape patchiness, keystone species
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Australia, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fires, Humans, Human Activities, Lizards, Population Density, Western Australia, Ecosystem, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Biota, Introduced Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review