Cited by 145Human-Animal Interaction StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly heritable and functionally relevant breed differences in dog behaviour

Open access
MacLean, Evan L., Snyder-Mackler, Noah, vonHoldt, Bridgett M., Serpell, James A.·2019·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Variation across dog breeds presents a unique opportunity to investigate the evolution and biological basis of complex behavioural traits. We integrated behavioural data from more than 14 000 dogs from 101 breeds with breed-averaged genotypic data ( n = 5697 dogs) from over 100 000 loci in the dog genome. We found high levels of among-breed heritability for 14 behavioural traits (the proportion of trait variance attributable to genetic similarity among breeds). We next identified 131 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with breed differences in behaviour, which were found in genes that are highly expressed in the brain and enriched for neurobiological functions and developmental processes, suggesting that they may be functionally associated with behavioural differences. Our results shed light on the heritability and genetic architecture of complex behavioural traits and identify dogs as a powerful model in which to address these questions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2019.0716

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Metadata

Authors
MacLean, E. L., Snyder-Mackler, N., vonHoldt, B. M., & Serpell, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
MacLean, Evan L.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2019-10-02
Volume
286
Issue
1912
Pages
20190716
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2978398499
Cited by
144
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institute on Aging (R00AG051764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
dog behavior, dog breeds, heritability, breed differences, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic architecture, brain gene expression, neurobiology, dog genome
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Breeding, Dogs, Genotype, Species Specificity, Genome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Heredity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review