Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 839

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

VIII. The deferred approach to the limit

Open access
Richardson, Lewis Fry, Gaunt, J. Arthur·1927·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character

Abstract

Various problems concerning infinitely many, infinitely small, parts, had been solved before the infinitesimal calculus was invented; for example, Archimedes on the circumference of the circle. The essence of the invention of the calculus appears to be that the passage to the limit was thereby taken at the earliest possible stage, where diverse problems had operations like d/dx in common. Although the infinitesimal calculus has been a splendid success, yet there remain problems in which it is cumbrous or unworkable. When such difficulties are encountered it may be well to return to the manner in which they did things before the calculus was invented, postponing the passage to the limit until after the problem had been solved for a moderate number of moderately small differences. For obtaining the solution of the difference-problem a variety of arithmetical processes are available. This memoir deals with central differences arranged in the simplest possible way, namely, that explained by the writer in the papers cited in the footnote. Advancing differences are ignored, and so are the varieties of central-difference-process in which accuracy is gained by complicating the arithmetic at an early stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.1927.0008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 839

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, L. F., & Gaunt, J. A.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character
Published
1927-01-01
Volume
226
Issue
636-646
Pages
299-361
ISSN
  • 0264-3952 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9258
OpenAlex
W2068073951
Cited by
839
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VIII. The deferred approach to the limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.1927.0008
The paper
Richardson, L. F., & Gaunt, J. A. (1927). VIII. The deferred approach to the limit. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1927.0008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.