The DOI matches its Crossref record.
VIII. The deferred approach to the limit
Open accessAbstract
Various problems concerning infinitely many, infinitely small, parts, had been solved before the infinitesimal calculus was invented; for example, Archimedes on the circumference of the circle. The essence of the invention of the calculus appears to be that the passage to the limit was thereby taken at the earliest possible stage, where diverse problems had operations like d/dx in common. Although the infinitesimal calculus has been a splendid success, yet there remain problems in which it is cumbrous or unworkable. When such difficulties are encountered it may be well to return to the manner in which they did things before the calculus was invented, postponing the passage to the limit until after the problem had been solved for a moderate number of moderately small differences. For obtaining the solution of the difference-problem a variety of arithmetical processes are available. This memoir deals with central differences arranged in the simplest possible way, namely, that explained by the writer in the papers cited in the footnote. Advancing differences are ignored, and so are the varieties of central-difference-process in which accuracy is gained by complicating the arithmetic at an early stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684
Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications
(2008) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2960953 · Cited by 4,327
Quantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621
Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits
Temme, K., Bravyi, S., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 · Cited by 1,379
Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices
Moll, N., Barkoutsos, P., Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Cross, A., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S., Fuhrer, A., Gambetta, J. M., Ganzhorn, M., et al. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aab822 · Cited by 744
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, L. F., & Gaunt, J. A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1927-01-01
- Volume
- 226
- Issue
- 636-646
- Pages
- 299-361
- ISSN
- 0264-3952 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9258
- OpenAlex
- W2068073951
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VIII. The deferred approach to the limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.1927.0008
- The paper
- Richardson, L. F., & Gaunt, J. A. (1927). VIII. The deferred approach to the limit. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1927.0008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.