The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring
Abstract
In broad terms, there are two approaches to damage identification. Model-driven methods establish a high-fidelity physical model of the structure, usually by finite element analysis, and then establish a comparison metric between the model and the measured data from the real structure. If the model is for a system or structure in normal (i.e. undamaged) condition, any departures indicate that the structure has deviated from normal condition and damage is inferred. Data-driven approaches also establish a model, but this is usually a statistical representation of the system, e.g. a probability density function of the normal condition. Departures from normality are then signalled by measured data appearing in regions of very low density. The algorithms that have been developed over the years for data-driven approaches are mainly drawn from the discipline of pattern recognition, or more broadly, machine learning. The object of this paper is to illustrate the utility of the data-driven approach to damage identification by means of a number of case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 3×
“A good summary of the initial efforts in the field is given in Doebling et al. (1996) that exhaustively surveys the field of damage identification (using vibration data) up to1995, citing 20papers that applyneural networks alone.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring
Sohn, H. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1935 · Cited by 883
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Martinez-Luengo, M., Kolios, A., & Wang, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 · Cited by 310
Broer, A. A. R., Benedictus, R., & Zarouchas, D. (2022) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace9040183 · Cited by 86
Cofre-Martel, S., Kobrich, P., Lopez Droguett, E., & Meruane, V. (2019) · Shock and Vibration · doi:10.1155/2019/9859281 · Cited by 65
Vitola, J., Pozo, F., Tibaduiza, D., & Anaya, M. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061252 · Cited by 60
Farreras-Alcover, I., Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., & Andersen, J. E. (2015) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921715609801 · Cited by 58
Wirtz, S. F., Cunha, A. P. A., Labusch, M., Marzun, G., Barcikowski, S., & Söffker, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18061775 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Worden, K., & Manson, G.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2006-12-12
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 1851
- Pages
- 515-537
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2039488112
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
