The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postharvest treatments of fresh produce
Open accessAbstract
Postharvest technologies have allowed horticultural industries to meet the global demands of local and large-scale production and intercontinental distribution of fresh produce that have high nutritional and sensory quality. Harvested products are metabolically active, undergoing ripening and senescence processes that must be controlled to prolong postharvest quality. Inadequate management of these processes can result in major losses in nutritional and quality attributes, outbreaks of foodborne pathogens and financial loss for all players along the supply chain, from growers to consumers. Optimal postharvest treatments for fresh produce seek to slow down physiological processes of senescence and maturation, reduce/inhibit development of physiological disorders and minimize the risk of microbial growth and contamination. In addition to basic postharvest technologies of temperature management, an array of others have been developed including various physical (heat, irradiation and edible coatings), chemical (antimicrobials, antioxidants and anti-browning) and gaseous treatments. This article examines the current status on postharvest treatments of fresh produce and emerging technologies, such as plasma and ozone, that can be used to maintain quality, reduce losses and waste of fresh produce. It also highlights further research needed to increase our understanding of the dynamic response of fresh produce to various postharvest treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1-Methylcyclopropene: a review
Blankenship, S. M., & Dole, J. M. (2003) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0925-5214(02)00246-6 · Cited by 1,234
The use of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on fruits and vegetables
Watkins, C. B. (2006) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.01.005 · Cited by 968
Self-citationFactors influencing the microbial safety of fresh produce: A review
Olaimat, A. N., & Holley, R. A. (2012) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016 · Cited by 908
Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review
Dhall, R. K. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.541568 · Cited by 884
Postharvest: an introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals
(2007) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845932275.0013 · Cited by 793
Cold Plasma Decontamination of Foods
Niemira, B. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101132 · Cited by 638
Lurie, S. (1998) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0925-5214(98)00045-3 · Cited by 582
Nitric oxide: a new player in plant signalling and defence responses
Wendehenne, D., Durner, J., & Klessig, D. F. (2004) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.04.002 · Cited by 544
Improvement of quality and shelf-life of strawberries with edible coatings enriched with chitosan
Gol, N. B., Patel, P. R., & Rao, T. V. R. (2013) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.008 · Cited by 505
(2013) · Cited by 490
Cited by
Global food security – Issues, challenges and technological solutions
Mc Carthy, U., Uysal, I., Badia-Melis, R., Mercier, S., O'Donnell, C., & Ktenioudaki, A. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.002 · Cited by 432
Fukao, T., Barrera-Figueroa, B. E., Juntawong, P., & Peña-Castro, J. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00340 · Cited by 401
Microbial spoilage of vegetables, fruits and cereals
Alegbeleye, O., Odeyemi, O. A., Strateva, M., & Stratev, D. (2022) · Applied Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.afres.2022.100122 · Cited by 389
Sharma, R., Shishodia, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Belhadi, A. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1830049 · Cited by 348
Reducing food losses by intelligent food logistics
Jedermann, R., Nicometo, M., Uysal, I., & Lang, W. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0302 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahajan, P. V., Caleb, O. J., Singh, Z., Watkins, C. B., & Geyer, M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2014-06-13
- Volume
- 372
- Issue
- 2017
- Pages
- 20130309
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2101757650
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 21.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postharvest treatments of fresh produce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2013.0309
- The paper
- Mahajan, P. V., Caleb, O. J., Singh, Z., Watkins, C. B., & Geyer, M. (2014). Postharvest treatments of fresh produce. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.