The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments
Open accessAbstract
How will the global atmosphere and climate be protected? Achieving net-zero CO 2 emissions will require carbon capture and storage (CCS) to reduce current GHG emission rates, and negative emissions technology (NET) to recapture previously emitted greenhouse gases. Delivering NET requires radical cost and regulatory innovation to impact on climate mitigation. Present NET exemplars are few, are at small-scale and not deployable within a decade, with the exception of rock weathering, or direct injection of CO 2 into selected ocean water masses. To keep warming less than 2°C, bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) has been modelled but does not yet exist at industrial scale. CCS already exists in many forms and at low cost. However, CCS has no political drivers to enforce its deployment. We make a new analysis of all global CCS projects and model the build rate out to 2050, deducing this is 100 times too slow. Our projection to 2050 captures just 700 Mt CO 2 yr −1 , not the minimum 6000 Mt CO 2 yr −1 required to meet the 2°C target. Hence new policies are needed to incentivize commercial CCS. A first urgent action for all countries is to commercially assess their CO 2 storage. A second simple action is to assign a Certificate of CO 2 Storage onto producers of fossil carbon, mandating a progressively increasing proportion of CO 2 to be stored. No CCS means no 2°C. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680
Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
Hulme, M. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841200 · Cited by 2,563
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Self-citationCarbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Self-citationWarming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne
Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Lowe, J. A., Meinshausen, M., & Meinshausen, N. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08019 · Cited by 1,689
Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., & Sokona, Y. (2014) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 1,637
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252
Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I
(2017) · doi:10.7930/j0j964j6 · Cited by 1,190
Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life
Norgaard, K. M. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262015448.001.0001 · Cited by 1,131
Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions
Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Snæbjörnsdottir, S. Ó., Oelkers, E. H., Gislason, S. R., Aradottir, E. S., Sigfusson, B., Gunnarsson, I., Sigurdardottir, H., Gunnlaugsson, E., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8132 · Cited by 1,076 · cited 1×
“[57] have trialled the injection of CO2 dissolved in brine into exceptionally porous recent basalt sediments and lavas in southwest Iceland, as part of the CarbFix experiment.”
Method
Cited by
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
Sorbents for the Direct Capture of CO 2 from Ambient Air
Shi, X., Xiao, H., Azarabadi, H., Song, J., Wu, X., Chen, X., & Lackner, K. S. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201906756 · Cited by 679
Hoang, A. T., Pham, V. V., & Nguyen, X. P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127161 · Cited by 663
The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
Nunes, L. J. R. (2023) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments10040066 · Cited by 587
The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Hanssen, S. V., Daioglou, V., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Doelman, J. C., Van Vuuren, D. P., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0885-y · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Haszeldine, R. S., Flude, S., Johnson, G., & Scott, V.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-04-02
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 2119
- Pages
- 20160447
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2795904783
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 50.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2016.0447
- The paper
- Haszeldine, R. S., Flude, S., Johnson, G., & Scott, V. (2018). Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
