Cited by 1,252Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and GeoengineeringCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

The trouble with negative emissions

Open access
Anderson, Kevin, Peters, Glen·2016·Science

Abstract

Reliance on negative-emission concepts locks in humankind's carbon addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aah4567

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, K., & Peters, G.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO)
Venue
Science
Published
2016-10-14
Volume
354
Issue
6309
Pages
182-183
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2531773248
Cited by
1,252
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 319 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 6
FWCI
201.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Research Council of Norway
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
carbon dioxide removal, climate change mitigation, carbon capture and storage, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review