Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physics-inspired analysis of the two-class income distribution in the USA in 1983–2018

Ludwig, Danial, Yakovenko, Victor M.·2022·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

The first part of this paper is a brief survey of the approaches to economic inequality based on ideas from statistical physics and kinetic theory. These include the Boltzmann kinetic equation, the time-reversal symmetry, the ergodicity hypothesis, entropy maximization and the Fokker–Planck equation. The origins of the exponential Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution and the Pareto power law are discussed in relation to additive and multiplicative stochastic processes. The second part of the paper analyses income distribution data in the USA for the time period 1983–2018 using a two-class decomposition. We present overwhelming evidence that the lower class (more than 90% of the population) is described by the exponential distribution, whereas the upper class (about 4% of the population in 2018) by the power law. We show that the significant growth of inequality during this time period is due to the sharp increase in the upper-class income share, whereas relative inequality within the lower class remains constant. We speculate that the expansion of the upper-class population and income shares may be due to increasing digitization and non-locality of the economy in the last 40 years. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2021.0162

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/0378-4371(95)00409-2 · DOI
  2. Chakrabarti BK. 2005 Econophys-Kolkata: a short story. In Econophysics of wealth distributions (eds A Chatterjee S Yarlagadda BK Chakrabarti) pp. 225–228. Milan Italy: Springer. · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s100510050249 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s100510070173 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00205-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1703 · DOI
  7. Cockshott WP, Cottrell AF, Michaelson GJ, Wright IP, Yakovenko VM. 2019 Classical econophysics. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139004169 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/9781316136119 · DOI
  10. 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60166-y · DOI
  11. 10.1080/09538259.2016.1205295 · DOI
  12. Scharfenaker E. 2020 Statistical equilibrium methods in analytical political economy. J. Econ. Surv. (doi:10.1111/joes.12403) · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.344.6186.828 · DOI
  14. 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60213-3 · DOI
  15. Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP. 1981 Physical kinetics. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  16. 10.1016/j.physa.2005.04.014 · DOI
  17. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. 1980 Statistical physics. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  18. 10.1119/1.2907776 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/e16126497 · DOI
  20. 10.3390/e15125565 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121420 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00298-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1209/epl/i2004-10330-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/PL00011112 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11403-017-0211-6 · DOI
  26. Pareto V. 1897 Cours d’Économie Politique. Lausanne, Switzerland: L’Université de Lausanne.
  27. Gibrat R. 1931 Les Inégalités Economiques. Paris: Sirely.
  28. 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01663-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075032 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.015 · DOI
  31. 10.1098/rsta.1895.0010 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.physa.2017.01.071 · DOI
  33. Kakwani N. 1980 Income inequality and poverty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ludwig, D., & Yakovenko, V. M.
Affiliations
JQI, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2022-04-11
Volume
380
Issue
2224
ISSN
  • 1364-503X
  • 1471-2962
Cited by
20
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review