Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

III. Experiments on the development of chick and duck embryos, cultivated in vitro

Open access
Waddington, Conrad Hal·1932·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character

Abstract

The experimental study of the developmental mechanics of the birds, and of the higher vertebrates in general, has hitherto been particularly difficult, since it has been impossible to keep the embryos alive in a situation in which the necessary manipulations can be successfully carried out. In the circumstances our knowledge of the subject is practically confined to such aspects as can be investigated by the method of isolation ; that is to say, chiefly to the aspect of self-differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1932.0003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Waddington, C. H.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character
Published
1932-01-01
Volume
221
Issue
474-482
Pages
179-230
ISSN
  • 0264-3960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9266
OpenAlex
W2108500866
Cited by
344
References
0
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: III. Experiments on the development of chick and duck embryos, cultivated in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1932.0003
The paper
Waddington, C. H. (1932). III. Experiments on the development of chick and duck embryos, cultivated in vitro. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1932.0003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.