Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How many species?

May, Robert Mccredie·1990·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

This paper begins with a survey of the patterns in discovering and recording species of animals and plants, from Linnaeus' time to the present. It then outlines various approaches to estimating what the total number of species on Earth might be: these approaches include extrapolation of past trends; direct assessments based on the overall fraction previously recorded among newly studied groups of tropical insects; indirect assessment derived from recent studies of arthropods in the canopies of tropical trees (giving special attention to the question of what fraction of the species found on a given host-tree are likely to be ‘effectively specialized' on it); and estimates inferred from theoretical and empirical patterns in species-size relations or in food web structure. I conclude with some remarks on the broader implications of our ignorance about how many species there are.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1990.0200

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
May, R. M.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1990-11-29
Volume
330
Issue
1257
Pages
293-304
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W306638812
Cited by
395
References
16
FWCI
16.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How many species? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1990.0200
The paper
May, R. M. (1990). How many species? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.