The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution
Abstract
The Darwinian explanation for evolution is that it is the outcome of the interaction between genetic variation and natural selection. There is now good evidence for both the existence of genetic variation and the occurrence of natural selection, the latter potentially at high intensities. The outcome should be rapid evolutionary change; yet in practice very little change is found. Most species are very stable, and in situations where evolution is observed in one species often none is found in others despite equivalent opportunity. Evolutionary failure is commonplace. Despite the occurrence of high levels of protein polymorphism, there is good evidence that the supply of variation making a major contribution to fitness is very limited. As a result it is argued that lack of evolution in most species may be due more to lack of appropriate variability than to other causes: a condition for which the term ‘ genostasis ’ is proposed. In those situations where appropriate genetic variation is available for one reason or another, evolution is found to be very rapid. There are good theoretical and practical reasons for more attention being paid to the mechanisms of supply of new variation and to those situations where evolution appears not to be taking place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation
Barton, N. H., & Charlesworth, B. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001025 · Cited by 681
Cited by
The Park Grass Experiment 1856-2006: Its contribution to ecology
SILVERTOWN, J., POULTON, P., JOHNSTON, E., EDWARDS, G., HEARD, M., & BISS, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x · Cited by 461
Rubisco Adaptation Is More Limited by Phylogenetic Constraint Than by Catalytic Trade-off
Bouvier, J. W., Emms, D. M., Rhodes, T., Bolton, J. S., Brasnett, A., Eddershaw, A., Nielsen, J. R., Unitt, A., Whitney, S. M., & Kelly, S. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab079 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradshaw, A. D.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1991-08-29
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 1267
- Pages
- 289-305
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2116522681
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1991.0079
- The paper
- Bradshaw, A. D. (1991). The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.