Cited by 54Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionMultisensory perception and integration

The knowledge used in vision and where it comes from

Open access
Barlow, Horace B.·1997·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Knowledge is often thought to be something brought from outside to act upon the visual messages received from the eye in a ‘top–down’ fashion, but this is a misleadingly narrow view. First, the visual system is a multilevel heterarchy with connections acting in all directions so it has no ‘top’; and second, knowledge is provided through innately determined structure and by analysis of the redundancy in sensory messages themselves, as well as from outside. This paper gives evidence about mechanisms analysing sensory redundancy in biological vision. Automatic gain controls for luminance and contrast depend upon feedback from the input, and there are strong indications that the autocorrelation function, and other associations between input variables, affect the contrast sensitivity function and our subjective experience of the world. The associative structure of sensory messages can provide much knowledge about the world we live in, and neural mechanisms that discount established associative structure in the input messages by recoding them can improve survival by making new structure more easily detectable. These mechanisms may be responsible for illusions, such as those produced by a concave face–mask, that are classically attributed to top–down influences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1997.0097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 54

Authors
Barlow, H. B.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Barlow, Horace B.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1997-08-29
Volume
352
Issue
1358
Pages
1141-1147
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2116993809
Cited by
54
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
visual perception, top-down processing, sensory redundancy, autocorrelation function, contrast sensitivity function, automatic gain control, feedback mechanisms, associative structures, optical illusions
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review