Cited by 294Human Pose and Action RecognitionHand Gesture Recognition SystemsVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion

Open access
Bobick, Aaron F.·1997·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

This paper presents several approaches to the machine perception of motion and discusses the role and levels of knowledge in each. In particular, different techniques of motion understanding as focusing on one of movement, activity or action are described. Movements are the most atomic primitives, requiring no contextual or sequence knowledge to be recognized; movement is often addressed using either view-invariant or view-specific geometric techniques. Activity refers to sequences of movements or states, where the only real knowledge required is the statistics of the sequence; much of the recent work in gesture understanding falls within this category of motion perception. Finally, actions are larger-scale events, which typically include interaction with the environment and causal relationships; action understanding straddles the grey division between perception and cognition, computer vision and artificial intelligence. These levels are illustrated with examples drawn mostly from the group's work in understanding motion in video imagery. It is argued that the utility of such a division is that it makes explicit the representational competencies and manipulations necessary for perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1997.0108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobick, A. F.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Bobick, Aaron F.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1997-08-29
Volume
352
Issue
1358
Pages
1257-1265
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2167072892
Cited by
294
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
motion perception, motion primitives, activity recognition, action understanding, sequence statistics, video-based motion analysis
MeSH terms
Motion Perception, Motor Activity, Movement, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review