Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents several approaches to the machine perception of motion and discusses the role and levels of knowledge in each. In particular, different techniques of motion understanding as focusing on one of movement, activity or action are described. Movements are the most atomic primitives, requiring no contextual or sequence knowledge to be recognized; movement is often addressed using either view-invariant or view-specific geometric techniques. Activity refers to sequences of movements or states, where the only real knowledge required is the statistics of the sequence; much of the recent work in gesture understanding falls within this category of motion perception. Finally, actions are larger-scale events, which typically include interaction with the environment and causal relationships; action understanding straddles the grey division between perception and cognition, computer vision and artificial intelligence. These levels are illustrated with examples drawn mostly from the group's work in understanding motion in video imagery. It is argued that the utility of such a division is that it makes explicit the representational competencies and manipulations necessary for perception.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The notion of using background knowledge to compensate for the ambivalence of sensor-based information has been around since the early days of HAR research.
“The notion of using background knowledge to compensate for the ambivalence of sensor-based information has been around since the early days of HAR research [15], initially in vision-based approaches [134], with later adoption in sensor-based work (e.g.[148]).”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements
Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1057 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Duric, Z., Gray, W. D., Heishman, R., Li, F., Rosenfeld, A., Schoelles, M. J., Schunn, C., & Wechsler, H. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2002.801449 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
The knowledge used in vision and where it comes from
Barlow, H. B. (1997) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0097 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Haresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Plötz, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3729467 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Haresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Ploetz, T. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…notion of using background knowledge to compensate for the ambivalence of sensor-based information has been around since the early days of HAR research [15], initially in vision-based approaches [127], with later adoption in sensor-based work (e.g. [140]) that have shown how reasoning about…”
- Authors
- Bobick, A. F.
- Affiliations
- MIT Media Lab (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bobick, Aaron F.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1997-08-29
- Volume
- 352
- Issue
- 1358
- Pages
- 1257-1265
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC1692010
- OpenAlex
- W2167072892
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- motion perception, motion primitives, activity recognition, action understanding, sequence statistics, video-based motion analysis
- MeSH terms
- Motion Perception, Motor Activity, Movement, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review