The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex numerical responses to top–down and bottom–up processes in vertebrate populations
Open accessAbstract
Population growth rate is determined in all vertebrate populations by food supplies, and we postulate bottom–up control as the universal primary standard. But this primary control system can be overridden by three secondary controls: top–down processes from predators, social interactions within the species and disturbances. Different combinations of these processes affect population growth rates in different ways. Thus, some relationships between growth rate and density can be hyperbolic or even have multiple nodes. We illustrate some of these in marsupial, ungulate and rabbit populations. Complex interactions between food, predators, environmental disturbance and social behaviour produce the myriad observations of population growth in nature, and we need to develop generalizations to classify populations. Different animal groups differ in the combination of these four processes that affect them, in their growth rates and in their vulnerability to extinction. Because conservation and management of populations depend critically on what factors drive population growth, we need to develop universal generalizations that will relieve us from the need to study every single population before we can make recommendations for management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ungulate Population Models with Predation: A Case Study with the North American Moose
Messier, F. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939551 · Cited by 552
Dynamics and Range Expansion of a Reestablished Muskox Population
Reynolds, P. E. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802350 · Cited by 59 · cited 2×
“Recently pulsed population growth has been demonstrated for elk in Yellowstone National Park (Lemke et al. 1998), muskox (Ovibos moschatus) on the tundra (Reynolds 1998) and wood bison (Bison bison) in Canada (figure 14) (Larter et al. 2000).”
Background
Cited by
Tanentzap, A. J., Kirby, K. J., & Goldberg, E. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.005 · Cited by 135
Biological effects of El Niño on the Galápagos penguin
Vargas, F. H., Harrison, S., Rea, S., & Macdonald, D. W. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.001 · Cited by 110
Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching
Steinmetz, R., Chutipong, W., Seuaturien, N., Chirngsaard, E., & Khaengkhetkarn, M. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.023 · Cited by 102
Intra‐ and inter‐annual variation in gray whale body condition on a foraging ground
Soledade Lemos, L., Burnett, J. D., Chandler, T. E., Sumich, J. L., & Torres, L. G. (2020) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3094 · Cited by 86
Effects on carrion consumption in a mammalian scavenger community when dominant species are excluded
Tobajas, J., Descalzo, E., Ferreras, P., Mateo, R., & Margalida, A. (2021) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00163-w · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinclair, A. R. E., & Krebs, C. J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2002-09-29
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 1425
- Pages
- 1221-1231
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2123338667
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex numerical responses to top–down and bottom–up processes in vertebrate populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2002.1123
- The paper
- Sinclair, A. R. E., & Krebs, C. J. (2002). Complex numerical responses to top–down and bottom–up processes in vertebrate populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.