Cited by 110Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Biological effects of El Niño on the Galápagos penguin

Vargas, F. Hernán, Harrison, Scott, Rea, Solanda, Macdonald, David W.·2006·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vargas, F. H., Harrison, S., Rea, S., & Macdonald, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Macdonald, David W.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
127
Issue
1
Pages
107-114
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091849207
Cited by
110
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Park Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
El Niño, Galápagos penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus, population decline (ecology), population recovery, sea surface temperature, 1982-1983 El Niño, 1997-1998 El Niño, long-term population monitoring, anthropogenic threats, Galápagos Islands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review