The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal origins of SARS coronavirus: possible links with the international trade in small carnivores
Open accessAbstract
The search for animal host origins of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus has so far remained focused on wildlife markets, restaurants and farms within China. A significant proportion of this wildlife enters China through an expanding regional network of illegal, international wildlife trade. We present the case for extending the search for ancestral coronaviruses and their hosts across international borders into countries such as Vietnam and Lao People's Democratic Republic, where the same guilds of species are found on sale in similar wildlife markets or food outlets. The three species that have so far been implicated, a viverrid, a mustelid and a canid, are part of a large suite of small carnivores distributed across this region currently overexploited by this international wildlife trade. A major lesson from SARS is that the underlying roots of newly emergent zoonotic diseases may lie in the parallel biodiversity crisis of massive species loss as a result of overexploitation of wild animal populations and the destruction of their natural habitats by increasing human populations. To address these dual threats to the long–term future of biodiversity, including man, requires a less anthropocentric and more interdisciplinary approach to problems that require the combined research expertise of ecologists, conservation biologists, veterinarians, epidemiologists, virologists, as well as human health professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Milner-Gulland, E. J., & Bennett, E. L. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00123-x · Cited by 757
Cited by
Wildlife Trade and Global Disease Emergence
Karesh, W. B., Cook, R. A., Bennett, E. L., & Newcomb, J. (2005) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1107.050194 · Cited by 623
An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia
Nijman, V. (2010) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9758-4 · Cited by 567
Wildlife as Source of Zoonotic Infections
Kruse, H., Kirkemo, A.-M., & Handeland, K. (2004) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1012.040707 · Cited by 482
The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A review of the current evidence
Chatterjee, P., Nagi, N., Agarwal, A., Das, B., Banerjee, S., Sarkar, S., Gupta, N., & Gangakhedkar, R. R. (2020) · Indian Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_519_20 · Cited by 258
Veterinary health of pangolins
Wicker, L. V., Lourens, K., & Hai, L. K. (2020) · Pangolins · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815507-3.00029-0 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, D., Roberton, S., & Hunter, P. R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-07-29
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 1447
- Pages
- 1107-1114
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2118361675
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal origins of SARS coronavirus: possible links with the international trade in small carnivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2004.1492
- The paper
- Bell, D., Roberton, S., & Hunter, P. R. (2004). Animal origins of SARS coronavirus: possible links with the international trade in small carnivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.