The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview
Open accessAbstract
Sexual conflict is a conflict between the evolutionary interests of individuals of the two sexes. The sexes can have different trait optima but this need not imply conflict if their optima can be attained simultaneously. Conflict requires an interaction between males and females (e.g. mating or parental care), such that the optimal outcomes for each sex cannot be achieved simultaneously. It is important to distinguish between battleground models, which define the parameter space for conflict and resolution models, which seek solutions for how conflicts are resolved. Overt behavioural conflict may or may not be manifest at resolution. Following Fisherian principles, an immediate (i.e. direct) benefit to a male that has a direct cost to his female partner can have an indirect benefit to the female via her male progeny. Female resistance to mating has been claimed to represent concurrence rather than conflict, due to female benefits via sons (males with low mating advantage are screened out by resistance). However, the weight of current evidence (both theoretical and empirical) supports sexual conflict for many cases. I review (i) conflicts over mate quality, encounters between males and females of genetically diverged subpopulations, mating rate and inbreeding, (ii) the special features of postcopulatory sexual conflict and (iii) some general features of importance for conflict resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Self-citationThe theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts
Maynard Smith, J. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6 · Cited by 2,410
The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems
Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433960 · Cited by 1,954
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Cited by
Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation
Gray, S. M., & McKinnon, J. S. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.005 · Cited by 593
Chapter 2 Sexual Segregation in Marine Fish, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals
Wearmouth, V. J., & Sims, D. W. (2008) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)00002-3 · Cited by 360
Permana, A. D., Fitri, L. L., & Julita, U. (2020) · Jurnal Biodjati · doi:10.15575/biodjati.v5i2.9049 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, G. A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2006-01-04
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 1466
- Pages
- 235-259
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2138074052
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 38.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2005.1785
- The paper
- Parker, G. A. (2006). Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.