Cited by 144Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Palaeoclimates: The first two billion years

Open access
Kasting, James F, Ono, Shuhei·2006·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

Earth's climate during the Archaean remains highly uncertain, as the relevant geologic evidence is sparse and occasionally contradictory. Oxygen isotopes in cherts suggest that between 3.5 and 3.2 Gyr ago (Ga) the Archaean climate was hot (55-85 degrees C); however, the fact that these cherts have experienced only a modest amount of weathering suggests that the climate was temperate, as today. The presence of diamictites in the Pongola Supergroup and the Witwatersrand Basin of South Africa suggests that by 2.9 Ga the climate was glacial. The Late Archaean was relatively warm; then glaciation (possibly of global extent) reappeared in the Early Palaeoproterozoic, around 2.3-2.4 Ga. Fitting these climatic constraints with a model requires high concentrations of atmospheric CO2 or CH4, or both. Solar luminosity was 20-25% lower than today, so elevated greenhouse gas concentrations were needed just to keep the mean surface temperature above freezing. A rise in O2 at approximately 2.4 Ga, and a concomitant decrease in CH4, provides a natural explanation for the Palaeoproterozoic glaciations. The Mid-Archaean glaciations may have been caused by a drawdown in H2 and CH4 caused by the origin of bacterial sulphate reduction. More work is needed to test this latter hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2006.1839

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The GOE was only roughly constrained to the interval 2.45 to 2.2 Ga.

    “A paucity of unambiguously continuous sedimentary records around this time meant that the GOE was only roughly constrained to the interval of 2.45 to 2.2 Ga (3, 14).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 144

Authors
Kasting, J. F., & Ono, S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
Corresponding author
Kasting, James F
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2006-05-05
Volume
361
Issue
1470
Pages
917-929
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2135490410
Cited by
144
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Agouron Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
early Earth climate, greenhouse gases, atmospheric CO2, methane, diamictite, Pongola Supergroup, Witwatersrand Basin, solar luminosity, atmospheric oxygen rise, sulfate reduction, early life
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Climate, Methane, Oxygen, South Africa, Solar System, Geologic Sediments, Evolution, Planetary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review