Cited by 440Philosophy and History of ScienceEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Beyond society: the evolution of organismality

Open access
Queller, David C., Strassmann, Joan E.·2009·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The evolution of organismality is a social process. All organisms originated from groups of simpler units that now show high cooperation among the parts and are nearly free of conflicts. We suggest that this near-unanimous cooperation be taken as the defining trait of organisms. Consistency then requires that we accept some unconventional organisms, including some social insect colonies, some microbial groups and viruses, a few sexual partnerships and a number of mutualistic associations. Whether we call these organisms or not, a major task is to explain such cooperative entities, and our survey suggests that many of the traits commonly used to define organisms are not essential. These non-essential traits include physical contiguity, indivisibility, clonality or high relatedness, development from a single cell, short-term and long-term genetic cotransmission, germ–soma separation and membership in the same species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2009.0095

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a range of possible MC levels of complexity between strict unicellularity and bona fide multicellular organisms.

    “There is a range of possible MC levels of complexity between strict unicellularity and bona fide multicellular organisms [188].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [188]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Queller, D. C., & Strassmann, J. E.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-11-12
Volume
364
Issue
1533
Pages
3143-3155
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2139279489
Cited by
440
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
90.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0816690, 0328455)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
evolution of organisms, social insects, microbial consortia, viruses, mutualism, clonality, species membership, indivisibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Cultural Evolution, Humans, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review