Cited by 96Animal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Capital and income breeding traits differentiate trophic match–mismatch dynamics in large herbivores

Open access
Kerby, Jeffrey, Post, Eric·2013·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

For some species, climate change has altered environmental conditions away from those in which life-history strategies evolved. In such cases, if adaptation does not keep pace with these changes, existing life-history strategies may become maladaptive and lead to population declines. We use life-history theory, with a specific emphasis on breeding strategies, in the context of the trophic match–mismatch framework to form generalizable hypotheses about population-level consumer responses to climate-driven perturbations in resource availability. We first characterize the income and breeding traits of sympatric caribou and muskoxen populations in western Greenland, and then test trait-based hypotheses about the expected reproductive performance of each population during a period of high resource variability at that site. The immediate reproductive performance of income breeding caribou decreased with trophic mismatch. In contrast, capital breeding muskoxen were relatively unaffected by current breeding season resource variability, but their reproductive performance was sensitive to resource conditions from previous years. These responses matched our expectations about how capital and income breeding strategies should influence population susceptibility to phenological mismatch. We argue for a taxon-independent assessment of trophic mismatch vulnerability based on a life-history strategy perspective in the context of prevailing environmental conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2012.0484

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Landscape-scale changes in vegetation have generated concerns about trophic mismatch.

    “and have generated concerns about trophic mismatch (Kirby and Post 2013).”

    From Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future (2020) · cites this paper as Kirby and Post 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 96

Authors
Kerby, J., & Post, E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
368
Issue
1624
Pages
20120484
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2096328484
Cited by
96
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
trophic mismatch, capital breeding, income breeding, life history strategies, reindeer, Ovibos moschatus, phenological mismatch, climate change, resource availability, reproductive performance, large herbivores, West Greenland
MeSH terms
Animals, Artiodactyla, Models, Biological, Reproduction, Food Chain, Herbivory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review