Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How arbitrary is language?

Open access
Monaghan, Padraic, Shillcock, Richard C., Christiansen, Morten H., Kirby, Simon·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

It is a long established convention that the relationship between sounds and meanings of words is essentially arbitrary—typically the sound of a word gives no hint of its meaning. However, there are numerous reported instances of systematic sound–meaning mappings in language, and this systematicity has been claimed to be important for early language development. In a large-scale corpus analysis of English, we show that sound–meaning mappings are more systematic than would be expected by chance. Furthermore, this systematicity is more pronounced for words involved in the early stages of language acquisition and reduces in later vocabulary development. We propose that the vocabulary is structured to enable systematicity in early language learning to promote language acquisition, while also incorporating arbitrariness for later language in order to facilitate communicative expressivity and efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2013.0299

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Plato, 1961, Cratylus. In The collected dialogues, 421
  2. Wilkins J, 1668, An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language
  3. Gasser M, 2004, Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, 434
  4. 10.1117/12.969060 · doi:10.1117/12.969060
  5. Hinton L, 1994, Sound symbolism
  6. Kantartzis K, 2009, Proc. 31st Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, 591
  7. Ohala J, 1994, Sound symbolism, 325
  8. Otis K, 2008, Proc. 30th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 65
  9. Hutchins SS. 1997 The psychological reality variability and compositionality of English phonesthemes. Dissertation Abstracts International 59 4500B. University Microfilms no. AAT 9901857.
  10. Shillcock RC, 2001, Proc. 2001 Conf. of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 53
  11. Baayen RH, 1995, The CELEX Lexical database
  12. 10.1075/ml.5.3.02mon · doi:10.1075/ml.5.3.02mon
  13. Burnard L, 1995, British national corpus: users reference guide British national corpus, v. 1.0
  14. Cuskley C, 2013, Oxford handbook of synaesthesia, 869
  15. Klein E, 1966, A comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English language: dealing with the origin of words and their sense development thus illustrating the history of civilization and culture
  16. OED Online. 2013 Oxford UK: Oxford University Press (accessed 5 July). See http://www.oed.com/.
  17. 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142 · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142 · Paper page
  18. Mantel N, 1967, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach, Cancer Res., 27, 209
  19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199910)41:1<64::AID-NEU9>3.0.CO;2-N · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199910)41:1<64::aid-neu9>3.0.co;2-n

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2014-09-19
Volume
369
Issue
1651
Pages
20130299
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2098586765
Cited by
317
References
57
FWCI
50.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How arbitrary is language? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
The paper
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.