The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality
Open accessAbstract
Musicality can be defined as a natural, spontaneously developing trait based on and constrained by biology and cognition. Music, by contrast, can be defined as a social and cultural construct based on that very musicality. One critical challenge is to delineate the constituent elements of musicality. What biological and cognitive mechanisms are essential for perceiving, appreciating and making music? Progress in understanding the evolution of music cognition depends upon adequate characterization of the constituent mechanisms of musicality and the extent to which they are present in non-human species. We argue for the importance of identifying these mechanisms and delineating their functions and developmental course, as well as suggesting effective means of studying them in human and non-human animals. It is virtually impossible to underpin the evolutionary role of musicality as a whole, but a multicomponent perspective on musicality that emphasizes its constituent capacities, development and neural cognitive specificity is an excellent starting point for a research programme aimed at illuminating the origins and evolution of musical behaviour as an autonomous trait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On aims and methods of ethology
Tinbergen, N. (1963) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x · Cited by 4,551
PINKER, S. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.x · Cited by 3,738
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010 · Cited by 1,592
Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty
Shubin, N., Tabin, C., & Carroll, S. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07891 · Cited by 842
Modularity of music processing
Peretz, I., & Coltheart, M. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1083 · Cited by 769
Self-citationWhy would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis
Patel, A. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142 · Cited by 703
Is Music an Evolutionary Adaptation?
HURON, D. (2001) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05724.x · Cited by 496
Music, the food of neuroscience?
Zatorre, R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/434312a · Cited by 362
The Prehistory of Music: Human Evolution, Archaeology, and the Origins of Musicality
Morley, I. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199234080.001.0001 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E., & Currie, T. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414495112 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Honing, H., ten Cate, C., Peretz, I., & Trehub, S. E.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-03-19
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 1664
- Pages
- 20140088
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2145666791
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
