Cited by 3,738Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceCognitive Science and Education ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

How the mind works

PINKER, STEVEN·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many top-down frameworks for understanding neural computation boil down to assuming that the brain simply optimizes a single, given cost function for a single computational architecture.

    “Interestingly, many of the “top down” frameworks boil down to assuming that the brain simply optimizes a single, given cost function for a single computational architecture.”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Pinker, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PINKER, S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
PINKER, STEVEN
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
882
Issue
1
Pages
119-127
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2133735566
Cited by
3,738
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 191 · 2012: 220
FWCI
305.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
mind, cognition, cognitive processes, neuroscience of cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Mental Processes, Thinking, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review