The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental studies illuminate the cultural transmission of percussive technologies in Homo and Pan
Abstract
The complexity of Stone Age tool-making is assumed to have relied upon cultural transmission, but direct evidence is lacking. This paper reviews evidence bearing on this question provided through five related empirical perspectives. Controlled experimental studies offer special power in identifying and dissecting social learning into its diverse component forms, such as imitation and emulation. The first approach focuses on experimental studies that have discriminated social learning processes in nut-cracking by chimpanzees. Second come experiments that have identified and dissected the processes of cultural transmission involved in a variety of other force-based forms of chimpanzee tool use. A third perspective is provided by field studies that have revealed a range of forms of forceful, targeted tool use by chimpanzees, that set percussion in its broader cognitive context. Fourth are experimental studies of the development of flint knapping to make functional sharp flakes by bonobos, implicating and defining the social learning and innovation involved. Finally, new and substantial experiments compare what different social learning processes, from observational learning to teaching, afford good quality human flake and biface manufacture. Together these complementary approaches begin to delineate the social learning processes necessary to percussive technologies within the Pan – Homo clade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Language, the fastest and most efficient way to transmit information, could have lent hominins a great competitive advantage79 by favouring the social transmission of knowledge related to lithic technology39,40.”
From Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language (2017) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McGuigan, N., Makinson, J., & Whiten, A. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712610x493115 · Cited by 322
Self-citationWhiten, A., Hinde, R. A., Laland, K. N., & Stringer, C. B. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0372 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00093-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0369 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0358 · DOI
- Hopper LM, 2012, The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology, 451, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738182.013.0024 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196005 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-7687.00194 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069 · DOI
- 10.1179/0197726114Z.00000000036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms7029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02382388 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-003-0183-x · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.159 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139178532 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0334 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.20694 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0351 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1993.1006 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1998.0350 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1212855109 · DOI
- 10.1038/21415 · DOI
- Whiten A, 2001, Charting cultural variation in chimpanzees, Behaviour, 138, 1489, 10.1163/156853901317367717 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.045 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.1994.1020 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026382316131 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2010.1112 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02382016 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02382181 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10329-004-0110-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-009-0275-3 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.186 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.22259 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0348 · DOI
- Matsuzawa T, 2001, Primate origins of human cognition and behaviour, 557, 10.1007/978-4-431-09423-4 · DOI
- Tomasello M, 1990, ‘Language’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives, 274, 10.1017/CBO9780511665486.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep05283 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2008.0134 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2008.0129 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04047 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0606015103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.031 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0010544 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853995X00036 · DOI
- 10.1080/019697201300001821 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2007.1542 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6 · DOI
- Galef BG, APA handbook of comparative psychology
- Toth N, 2006, The Oldowan: case studies into the earliest Stone Age, 155
- Savage-Rumbaugh S, 2006, The Oldowan: case studies into the earliest Stone Age, 223
- Putt SS, 2015, The origins of stone tool reduction and the transition to knapping: an experimental approach, J. Arch. Sci. Rep., 2, 51
- 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.026 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2012.0422 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2012.0414 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1261735 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2015.0105 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.042 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0786 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2011.0147 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0113567 · DOI
- Hecht EE, 2014, Acquisition of Paleolithic toolmaking abilities involves structural remodeling to inferior frontoparietal regions, Brain Struct. Func, 222, 2315
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9050-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07619.x · DOI
- Stout D, 2013, Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion, 157, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0009 · DOI
- Khreisheh NN, 2013, Extending experimental control: the use of porcelain in flaked stone experimentation, Adv. Arch. Prac, 1, 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lombao, D., Guardiola, M., & Mosquera, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y · Cited by 86
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiten, A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-11-19
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 1682
- Pages
- 20140359
- ISSN
- 0962-8436
- 1471-2970
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-01-05)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review