The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE ROLE OF VERBAL INTERACTION DURING EXPERIMENTAL BIFACIAL STONE TOOL MANUFACTURE
Abstract
Many researchers have hypothesized an analogous, and possibly evolutionary, relationship between Paleolithic stone tool manufacture and language. This study uses a unique design to investigate how spoken language may affect the transmission of learning to make stone tools and comes to surprising results that may have important implications for our views of this relationship. We conducted an experiment to test the effect of verbal communication on large core biface manufacture during the earliest stages of learning. Previously untrained flintknappers were assigned to two different communication conditions, one with and one without spoken language, and were instructed to replicate the bifaces produced by the same instructor. The attempted bifaces (total = 334) from the two groups were compared using an Elliptical Fourier analysis, the Flip Test, and a rating scale by an independent lithicist. We found no significant difference in the overall shape, symmetry, or other measures of skill among the two groups, using all three of these methods. Analysis of the 18,149 debitage elements from the experiment, however, revealed that the two groups set up their striking platforms in fundamentally different ways. The nonverbal group produced more efficient flakes than the verbal group, as evidenced by the significantly higher ratios of platform width to platform thickness and size to mass of the nonverbal subjects’ flakes. These results indicate that verbal interaction is not a necessary c…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ohnuma et al.34 and Putt et al.38 found that verbal language did not represent an advantage over gestural communication.”
From Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language (2017) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41 · Cited by 3,137
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683
Arbib, M. A. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000038 · Cited by 1,164
McGuigan, N., Makinson, J., & Whiten, A. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712610x493115 · Cited by 322
Predictors of language acquisition in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders
Thurm, A., Lord, C., Lee, L.-C., & Newschaffer, C. (2007) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0300-1 · Cited by 306
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 88
- 10.1126/science.1059487 · DOI
- 10.1086/650296 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511810244 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9043-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438240220134241 · DOI
- Cheney Dorothy, 1998, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 175
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00136-0 · DOI
- Clark J. D., 1980, Man and Environment, 4, 44
- 10.1017/S0959774305000016 · DOI
- Davidson Iain, 1993, Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution, 363
- Deacon Terrence W., 1997, The Symbolic Species
- Dibble Harold, 1997, Lithic Technology, 22, 150, 10.1080/01977261.1997.11754540 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0012 · DOI
- 10.7183/0002-7316.76.2.229 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.011 · DOI
- Finlay Nyree, 2008, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15, 69
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01494-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10539-005-5597-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511817779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/356625.356627 · DOI
- Gatewood John, 1985, Directions in Cognitive Anthropology, 199
- 10.1017/S0140525X00071235 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470750711.ch1 · DOI
- Hardaker Terry, 2005, Antiquity
- Heilman Kenneth M., 2002, Clinical Neuropsychology
- 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02530.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/y94-081 · DOI
- 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283315570 · DOI
- Hintze Jerry, 2001, NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems
- Hoard Robert J., 2003, Plains Anthropologist, 48, 36, 10.1080/2052546.2003.11949321 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70387-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-6861-6_10 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 · DOI
- Keller Charles M., 1996, Cognition and Tool Use: the Blacksmith at Work
- 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90102-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0146-664X(82)90034-X · DOI
- Kurata Kiyoshi, 1986, Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 403, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-02-00403.1986 · DOI
- Lestrel Pete E., 2008, Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology
- 10.2307/2411632 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0704452104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.01.001 · DOI
- McPherron Shannon P., 1999, Lithic Technology, 24, 38, 10.1080/01977261.1999.11720944 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00179-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02436590 · DOI
- Milne S. Brooke, 2013, Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice, 119
- Mitchell J. C., 1996, Lithics, 16, 64
- Moore Mark W., 2010, Stone Tools and the Evolution of Human Cognition, 13
- 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.555 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610368808 · DOI
- 10.1537/ase.105.159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.56.3.286 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn2811 · DOI
- Renaud Sabrina, 1996, Paleobiology, 22, 255, 10.1017/S0094837300016201 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00248742 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90847-7 · DOI
- Root Matthew, 2000, The Archaeology of the Bobtail Wolf Site
- 10.1016/j.jas.2005.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1997.0265 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.2000.0455 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2007.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1002/evan.20112 · DOI
- 10.1179/009346990791548349 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2011.0295 · DOI
- 10.1086/342638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.014 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0959774309000055 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2008.0001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.049 · DOI
- Tomasello Michael, 1999, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
- 10.1007/BF02436405 · DOI
- Toth Nicholas, 1993, Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution, 346
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0072693 · DOI
- 10.1037/11193-000 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069 · DOI
- 10.1179/jfa.1987.14.4.465 · DOI
- Whittaker John C., 1994, Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools, 10.7560/790827 · DOI
- Whittaker John C., 2001, Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, 32
- 10.1086/322547 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00037924 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00044101 · DOI
- Woods, Alexander D. 2011The Effects of Lithic Raw Material Quality on Aurignacian Blade Production at Abri Cellier. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.
- 10.1017/S0140525X02000079 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lombao, D., Guardiola, M., & Mosquera, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Putt, S. S., Woods, A. D., & Franciscus, R. G.
- Venue
- Lithic Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-112
- ISSN
- 0197-7261
- 2051-6185
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review