The role of self–other distinction in understanding others' mental and emotional states: neurocognitive mechanisms in children and adults
Open accessAbstract
Social interactions come with the fundamental problem of trying to understand others' mental and affective states while under the overpowering influence of one's own concurrent thoughts and feelings. The ability to distinguish between simultaneous representations of others' current experiences as well as our own is crucial to navigate our complex social environments successfully. The developmental building blocks of this ability and how this is given rise to by functional and structural brain development remains poorly understood. In this review, I outline some of the key findings on the role of self–other distinction in understanding others' mental as well as emotional states in children and adults. I will begin by clarifying the crucial role for self–other distinction in avoiding egocentric attributions of one's own cognitive as well as affective states to others in adults and outline the underlying neural circuitry in overcoming such egocentricity. This will provide the basis for a discussion of the emergence of self–other distinction in early childhood as well as developmental changes therein throughout childhood and into adulthood. I will demonstrate that self–other distinction of cognitive and emotional states is already dissociable early in development. Concomitantly, I will show that processes of self–other distinction in cognitive and affective domains rely on adjacent but distinct neural circuitry each with unique connectivity profiles, presumably related to the nature of the distinction that needs to be made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with ASD often show difficulty in evaluating social cues and in appropriately interpreting another person's experiences or emotions, and may display a preoccupation with self or limited interest in others.
“Individuals with ASD often show difficulty in evaluating social cues and in appropriately interpreting another person’s experiences or emotions, and may display a preoccupation with self or limited interest in others 14–19.”
From Reduced sociability and social agency encoding in adult Shank3-mutant mice are restored through gene re-expression in real time (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Individuals with ASD are often described as having inability to organize social information or appropriately interpret the state and experience of others.
“Individuals with ASD are often described as having inability to organize social information or appropriately interpret the state and experience of others 14–19.”
From Reduced sociability and social agency encoding in adult Shank3-mutant mice are restored through gene re-expression in real time (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-other distinction is implemented in different temporoparietal brain regions.
“A process that is critical for both, empathy and ToM, is self-other distinction, which is implemented in different temporoparietal brain regions.”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
The right temporoparietal junction is functionally connected to other parts of the Theory of Mind neural network, such as the medial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex.
“It is also functionally connected to other parts of the ToM neural network, such as the medial and ventrolateral PFC and the PCC [45 ,46].”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
The right temporoparietal junction is critical to overcome cognitive egocentricity.
“On a neural level, the right TPJ seems to be critical to overcome cognitive egocentricity [45 ].”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Steinbeis, N.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Steinbeis, Nikolaus
- ORCID
- Steinbeis, Nikolaus
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2016-01-19
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 1686
- Pages
- 20150074
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC4685520
- OpenAlex
- W2415935486
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-02-19)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- self-other distinction, theory of mind, emotional understanding, social cognition, cognitive development, neural development, brain connectivity, children, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Brain, Child, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Self Concept, Social Perception, Psychology, Developmental
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review