Cited by 173Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

The role of self–other distinction in understanding others' mental and emotional states: neurocognitive mechanisms in children and adults

Open access
Steinbeis, Nikolaus·2016·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Social interactions come with the fundamental problem of trying to understand others' mental and affective states while under the overpowering influence of one's own concurrent thoughts and feelings. The ability to distinguish between simultaneous representations of others' current experiences as well as our own is crucial to navigate our complex social environments successfully. The developmental building blocks of this ability and how this is given rise to by functional and structural brain development remains poorly understood. In this review, I outline some of the key findings on the role of self–other distinction in understanding others' mental as well as emotional states in children and adults. I will begin by clarifying the crucial role for self–other distinction in avoiding egocentric attributions of one's own cognitive as well as affective states to others in adults and outline the underlying neural circuitry in overcoming such egocentricity. This will provide the basis for a discussion of the emergence of self–other distinction in early childhood as well as developmental changes therein throughout childhood and into adulthood. I will demonstrate that self–other distinction of cognitive and emotional states is already dissociable early in development. Concomitantly, I will show that processes of self–other distinction in cognitive and affective domains rely on adjacent but distinct neural circuitry each with unique connectivity profiles, presumably related to the nature of the distinction that needs to be made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2015.0074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 173

Authors
Steinbeis, N.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Steinbeis, Nikolaus
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
371
Issue
1686
Pages
20150074
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2415935486
Cited by
173
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
self-other distinction, theory of mind, emotional understanding, social cognition, cognitive development, neural development, brain connectivity, children, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Brain, Child, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Self Concept, Social Perception, Psychology, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review