Cited by 348Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind

Open access
Preckel, Katrin, Kanske, Philipp, Singer, Tania·2018·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Empathy, compassion and Theory of Mind (ToM) are central topics in social psychology and neuroscience. While empathy enables the sharing of others’ emotions and may result in empathic distress, a maladaptive form of empathic resonance, or compassion, a feeling of warmth and concern for others, ToM provides cognitive understanding of someone else's thoughts or intentions. These socio-affective and socio-cognitive routes to understanding others are subserved by separable, independent brain networks. Nonetheless they are jointly required in many complex social situations. A process that is critical for both, empathy and ToM, is self-other distinction, which is implemented in different temporoparietal brain regions. Thus, adaptive social behavior is a result of dynamic interplay of socio-affective and socio-cognitive processes.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review argues that empathy, compassion, and Theory of Mind (ToM) are separable socio-affective and socio-cognitive functions supported by distinct brain networks, yet they interact dynamically in complex social situations. Self-other distinction, implemented in temporoparietal regions, is proposed as a process critical to both empathy and ToM.

Key findings

  • Empathy (sharing others' feelings) and ToM (inferring others' mental states) are separable on conceptual, behavioral, and neural levels: "strong empathizers are not necessarily proficient mentalizers," and each domain can be selectively impaired — ToM in autism, empathy propensity in psychopathy/chronic aggression.
  • Empathy for pain recruits shared activations in anterior insula (AI) and anterior middle cingulate cortex (aMCC); compassion instead engages reward/affiliation networks (ventral striatum, nucleus accumbens, VTA, mOFC, sgACC); ToM engages ventral TPJ, STS, temporal poles, MPFC, and precuneus/PCC.
  • The networks interact: when confronted with others' distress, AI activity inhibits TPJ activity, and this reduction in TPJ activity is related to impaired ToM performance.
  • Self-other distinction relies on distinct temporoparietal regions — right TPJ for overcoming cognitive egocentricity and right supramarginal gyrus (rSMG) for emotional egocentricity; TMS disruption of rSMG increases emotional egocentricity.
  • Empathic distress is described as a maladaptive outcome of empathy, whereas compassion acts as an emotion-regulation strategy that buffers negative affect by up-regulating positive affect via reward- and affiliation-related circuitry.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of social psychology and neuroscience literature on empathy, compassion, and ToM, with no new empirical data reported.
  • The review describes the EmpaToM task (Kanske et al.), a 2 (emotionality of video) × 2 (ToM requirements) design in which each actor presented emotional negative/neutral videos and videos with ToM or factual-reasoning demands, followed by valence, compassion, and confidence ratings.
  • Cited supporting evidence includes a structural covariance analysis in 270 healthy adults and a charitable donation task linking AI activity to empathy-based giving and TPJ activity to perspective-taking-based giving.

Limitations

  • The paper states no limitations; its only declaration is "Conflict: Nothing declared."
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review it reports no systematic search strategy or formal quality appraisal, and the empirical claims (e.g., AI–TPJ inhibition, rSMG causality) are drawn from cited primary studies rather than re-analyzed here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.010

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 69 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationcitation

    When activated together in complex social situations, the two networks may directly influence each other.

    “When activated together in complex social situations, the two networks may also directly influence each other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    AI and aMCC are a core network activated whenever we witness the suffering of others.

    “Meta-analyses have later identified these regions as a core network that is activated whenever we witness the suffering of others [8,9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    When confronted with others' distress, the anterior insula inhibits activity in the temporoparietal junction, an important hub of the mentalizing network.

    “Indeed, when confronted with others' distress, the AI, which is activated for negative affect sharing, inhibits activity in TPJ, an important hub of the mentalizing network [27 ].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Self-other distinction is critical for both empathy and Theory of Mind.

    “A process that is critical for both, empathy and ToM, is self-other distinction, which is implemented in different temporoparietal brain regions.”
    • Also stated in: § Self-other distinction · plain
      “The distinction of self and other constitutes an important element of both empathy and ToM, as it enables the differentiation between one's own emotional or mental states and the states shared with others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    In empathy for pain paradigms, common activations are observed in the typical empathy related core network.

    “Common activations were observed in the typical empathy related core network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Empathy and Theory of Mind are jointly required and interact in many complex social situations.

    “Nonetheless they are jointly required in many complex social situations.”
    • Also stated in: § Concluding remarks · plain
      “Despite the separability of socio-affective and socio-cognitive functions, these social capacities are jointly activated and interact in complex social situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The EmpaToM task activates separable brain networks that can be replicated in resting state functional connectivity and on a brain structural level.

    “The EmpaToM clearly activates separable brain networks that can be replicated in resting state functional connectivity [25 ] and on a brain structural level [26 ].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Emotional egocentricity occurs when one's own emotional state influences the judgment of someone else's affective state.

    “Emotional egocentricity occurs when one's own emotional state influences the judgment of someone else's affective state [41].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In autism, Theory of Mind is deficient, while no empathy deficits are observed when controlling for alexithymia.

    “In autism, ToM is deficient [28][29][30][31], while no empathy deficits are observed when controlling for alexithymia [32][33][34][35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Empathy, compassion and Theory of Mind are separable on a conceptual, behavioral and neural level.

    “These socio-affective and sociocognitive routes to understanding others are subserved by separable, independent brain networks.”
    • Also stated in: § Concluding remarks · plain
      “Sharing affective states with another person (empathy), feeling concern for another (compassion) and reasoning about another person's mental state (ToM) are separable on a conceptual, behavioral and neural level; strong empathizers are not necessarily proficient mentalizers and each domain may be selectively impaired in psychopathologies such as autism or psychopathy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The adaptive value of this inhibitory mechanism in salient, emotional situations may be to prepare for immediate action in the external world.

    “The adaptive value of this inhibitory mechanism in salient, emotional situations may be to prepare for immediate action in the external world [39].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In psychopathy or chronic aggression, Theory of Mind is intact, but the propensity to empathize with others is reduced.

    “In psychopathy or chronic aggression, in contrast, ToM is intact, but the propensity to empathize with others is reduced [36,37].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cue-based paradigms require additional inference of the other's affective state from an abstract cue, and the Theory of Mind related network is co-active.

    “As the cue-based paradigms require additional inference of the other's affective state from an abstract cue, the ToM related network is co-active [8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive egocentricity occurs when one's own knowledge about a situation influences the reasoning about what someone else thinks about the situation, but can also affect simple decisions about the visual perspective of another.

    “Cognitive egocentricity occurs when the own knowledge about a situation influences the reasoning about what someone else thinks about the situation [42], but can also affect simple decisions about the visual perspective of another [44].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [42]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individual differences in empathy and Theory of Mind are unrelated on a behavioral and neural level; strong empathizers are not necessarily proficient mentalizers.

    “Crucially, individual differences in empathy and ToM are unrelated on a behavioral and neural level, that is, strong empathizers are not necessarily proficient mentalizers [27 ].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An original adaptive empathic response to the suffering of others can lead to a maladaptive response, that is, empathic distress which can be reversed by learning how to turn empathy into compassion.

    “Furthermore, an original adaptive empathic response to the suffering of others can lead to a maladaptive response, that is, empathic distress which can be reversed by learning how to turn empathy into compassion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In well-trained long-term meditators, cognitive reappraisal was most efficient in reducing negative affect, but compassion induction worked through up-regulation of positive affect and associated networks in the brain.

    “The direct comparison of compassion to the most widely investigated emotion regulation strategy -reappraisal showed that in well-trained long-term meditators, cognitive reappraisal was most efficient in reducing negative affect, but compassion induction worked through up-regulation of positive affect and associated networks in the brain [14 ].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Empathy and Theory of Mind measurements from an independent task were related to these functions' role in donation decisions, suggesting that stable individual propensities are involved in prosocial behavior.

    “Remarkably, empathy and ToM measurements from an independent task, were also related to these functions' role in donation decisions, suggesting that stable individual propensities are involved in prosocial behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Empathic distress describes the intense sharing of other's emotions and may be detrimental, because it can result in own suffering as well as asocial or even antisocial effects, such as aggressive verbal behavior.

    “While empathy may be related to prosociality, a particular outcome of empathy -empathic distress -describes the intense sharing of other's emotions and may be detrimental, because it can result in own suffering as well as in asocial or even antisocial effects, such as aggressive verbal behavior [18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anterior insula activity predicted generous donations when participants reported empathic feelings for the charity's goal before, while temporoparietal junction activity predicted donations when participants took the perspective of the organization's cause.

    “Specifically, AI activity predicted generous donations when participants reported empathic feelings for the charity's goal before, while TPJ activity predicted donations, when participants took the perspective of the organization's cause [48 ].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The critical property of compassion may be that it counteracts negative emotion elicited by experiencing others' suffering through positive emotion generation, thereby acting as an emotion regulation strategy.

    “The critical property of compassion may be that it counteracts negative emotion elicited by experiencing others' suffering through positive emotion generation, thereby acting as an emotion regulation strategy [14 ,15,53].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Temporoparietal regions seem to play a crucial role in overcoming egocentricity, possibly contributing to self-other distinction.

    “Thus, temporoparietal regions seem to play a crucial role in overcoming egocentricity, possibly contributing to self-other distinction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
17 of 17

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preckel, K., Kanske, P., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Preckel, Katrin
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740027066
Cited by
348
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
empathy, compassion, theory of mind, social affect, socio-cognitive processes, self-other distinction, temporoparietal cortex, empathic distress, empathic resonance, social cognition, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review