Cited by 58Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationPhilosophy and History of Science

Stabilizing multicellularity through ratcheting

Open access
Libby, Eric, Conlin, Peter L., Kerr, Ben, Ratcliff, William C.·2016·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The evolutionary transition to multicellularity probably began with the formation of simple undifferentiated cellular groups. Such groups evolve readily in diverse lineages of extant unicellular taxa, suggesting that there are few genetic barriers to this first key step. This may act as a double-edged sword: labile transitions between unicellular and multicellular states may facilitate the evolution of simple multicellularity, but reversion to a unicellular state may inhibit the evolution of increased complexity. In this paper, we examine how multicellular adaptations can act as evolutionary 'ratchets', limiting the potential for reversion to unicellularity. We consider a nascent multicellular lineage growing in an environment that varies between favouring multicellularity and favouring unicellularity. The first type of ratcheting mutations increase cell-level fitness in a multicellular context but are costly in a single-celled context, reducing the fitness of revertants. The second type of ratcheting mutations directly decrease the probability that a mutation will result in reversion (either as a pleiotropic consequence or via direct modification of switch rates). We show that both types of ratcheting mutations act to stabilize the multicellular state. We also identify synergistic effects between the two types of ratcheting mutations in which the presence of one creates the selective conditions favouring the other. Ratcheting mutations may play a key role in diverse evolutionary transitions in individuality, sustaining selection on the new higher-level organism by constraining evolutionary reversion.This article is part of the themed issue 'The major synthetic evolutionary transitions'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2015.0444

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ratcheting processes, where cells acquire traits that commit them to a group lifestyle, stabilize the group and may serve as a universal mechanism that propels multicellular complexity.

    “This is enabled by ‘ratcheting’ processes where cells acquire traits that commit them to a group lifestyle. This stabilizes the group and may serve as a universal mechanism that propels multicellular complexity [201,202].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says ratcheting traits can stabilize multicellularity against reversion and may facilitate increased complexity. It does not establish a universal mechanism: it describes ratcheting as a possible stepping stone and notes that such traits would be detrimental in life cycles that require switching between unicellular and multicellular forms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One solution to stabilizing MC against cheaters is the evolution of traits that increase cell-level fitness in a group context but come at a cost to free-living fitness.

    “One solution to stabilizing MC against cheaters is the evolution of traits that increase cell-level fitness in a group context but come at a cost to free-living fitness.”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe traits that improve fitness in a multicellular context while reducing it in a unicellular context, thereby stabilizing multicellularity against reversion. The paper distinguishes reversion to unicellularity from conflict among competing cells within a group; it does not establish this mechanism as a solution specifically against cheaters. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Buss LW 1987 The evolution of individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  2. [2]Smith JM, Szathmáry E 1995 The major transitions in evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. [3]Michod RE, Roze D 1999 Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. III. Transitions in the unit of fitness. In Mathematical and computational biology: computational morphogenesis, hierarchical complexity, and digital evolution (ed. Nehaniv CL), pp. 47– 92. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
  4. [13]Bonner JT 2001 First signals: the evolution of multicellular development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. [50]Godfrey-Smith P 2009 Darwinian populations and natural selection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Libby, E., Conlin, P. L., Kerr, B., & Ratcliff, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Department of Biology and BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Libby, Eric
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
371
Issue
1701
Pages
20150444
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2496969863
Cited by
58
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DBI-0939454, DGE-1256082)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AR33G)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
evolution of multicellularity, evolutionary transitions, individuality, pleiotropy, environmental variability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review