Cooperation and cheating as innovation: insights from cellular societies
Open accessAbstract
The capacity to innovate is often considered a defining feature of human societies, but it is not a capacity that is unique to human societies: innovation occurs in cellular societies as well. Cellular societies such as multicellular bodies and microbial communities, including the human microbiome, are capable of innovation in response to novel opportunities and threats. Multicellularity represents a suite of innovations for cellular cooperation, but multicellularity also opened up novel opportunities for cells to cheat, exploiting the infrastructure and resources of the body. Multicellular bodies evolve less quickly than the cells within them, leaving them vulnerable to cellular innovations that can lead to cancer and infections. In order to counter these threats, multicellular bodies deploy additional innovations including the adaptive immune system and the development of partnerships with preferred microbial partners. What can we learn from examining these innovations in cooperation and cheating in cellular societies? First, innovation in social systems involves a constant tension between novel mechanisms that enable greater size and complexity of cooperative entities and novel ways of cheating. Second, cultivating cooperation with partners who can rapidly and effectively innovate (such as microbes) is important for large entities including multicellular bodies. And third, multicellularity enabled cells to manage risk socially, allowing organisms to survive in challenging environments where life would otherwise be impossible. Throughout, we ask how insights from cellular societies might be translated into new innovations in human health and medicine, promoting and protecting the cellular cooperation that makes us viable multicellular organisms. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Process and pattern in innovations from cells to societies’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The problem of cheaters arises from the asymmetry in time scales of growth: MC systems evolve slowly compared to the cells within them, which makes them vulnerable to cellular innovations, as occurs with cancer.
“The problem arises from the asymmetry in time scales of growth: MC systems evolve slowly compared to the cells within them, which makes them vulnerable to cellular innovations, as occurs with cancer [200].”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [200]
Cites
Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: A gut microbiota perspective
LeBlanc, J. G., Milani, C., de Giori, G. S., Sesma, F., van Sinderen, D., & Ventura, M. (2013) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.005 · Cited by 1,613 · see citing works
The major evolutionary transitions
Szathmáry, E., & Smith, J. M. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374227a0 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Ecological and immunological determinants of influenza evolution.
Ferguson, N. M., Galvani, A. P., & Bush, R. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01509 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
O'Shea, E. F., Cotter, P. D., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2012) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.025 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review
Takács, K., Gross, J., Testori, M., Letina, S., Kenny, A. R., Power, E. A., & Wittek, R. P. M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0297 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The problem arises from the asymmetry in time scales of growth: MC systems evolve slowly compared to the cells within them, which makes them vulnerable to cellular innovations, as occurs with cancer [200].”
Background
- Authors
- Aktipis, A., & Maley, C. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Volume
- 372
- Issue
- 1735
- Pages
- 20160421
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC5665809
- OpenAlex
- W2765198501
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (Breakthrough Award DoD/Breast Cancer Research Prog)
- NIH/NCI (Genomic and Microenvironmental Diversity as Driver)
- John Templeton Foundation (Generous by Nature: The Human Generosity Project)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- innovation, cellular cooperation, cheating, multicellularity, microbial communities, human microbiome, cancer, infection, adaptive immunity, social evolution, cell evolution, human health
- MeSH terms
- Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, Microbial Interactions, Eukaryota, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review