The DOI matches its Crossref record.
III. On the computation of the effect of the attraction of mountain-masses, as disturbing the apparent astronomical latitude of stations in geodetic surveys
Abstract
A Paper of great ability has lately been communicated to the Royal Society by Archdeacon Pratt, in which the disturbing effects of the mass of high land northeast of the valley of the Ganges, upon the apparent astronomical latitudes of the principal stations of the Indian Arc of Meridian, are investigated. It is not my intention here to comment upon the mathematical methods used by the author of that paper, or upon the physical measures on which the numerical calculation of his formulæ is based, but only to call attention to the principal result; namely, that the attraction of the mountain-ground, thus computed on the theory of gravitation, is considerably greater than is necessary to explain the anomalies observed. This singular conclusion, I confess, at first surprised me very much. Yet, upon considering the theory of the earth’s figure as affected by disturbing causes, with the aid of the best physical hypothesis (imperfect as it must be) which I am able to apply to it, it appears to me, not only that there is nothing surprising in Archdeacon Pratt’s conclusion, but that it ought to have been anticipated; and that, instead of expecting a positive effect of attraction of a large mountain mass upon a station at a considerable distance from it, we ought to be prepared to expect no effect whatever, or in some cases even a small negative effect. The reasoning upon which this opinion is founded, inasmuch as it must have some application to almost every investigation of geodesy, may perhaps merit the attention of the Royal Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GLOBAL GLACIAL ISOSTASY AND THE SURFACE OF THE ICE-AGE EARTH: The ICE-5G (VM2) Model and GRACE
Peltier, W. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359 · Cited by 2,743
Gravitational collapse of the continental crust: definition, regimes and modes
Rey, P., Vanderhaeghe, O., & Teyssier, C. (2001) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/s0040-1951(01)00174-3 · Cited by 488
Subsurface loading and estimates of the flexural rigidity of continental lithosphere
Forsyth, D. W. (1985) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb090ib14p12623 · Cited by 469
Ravikumar, M., Singh, B., Pavan Kumar, V., Satyakumar, A. V., Ramesh, D. S., & Tiwari, V. M. (2020) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/2020tc006219 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Airy, G. B.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1855-12-31
- Issue
- 145
- Pages
- 101-104
- ISSN
- 0261-0523 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9223
- OpenAlex
- W3092361928
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: III. On the computation of the effect of the attraction of mountain-masses, as disturbing the apparent astronomical latitude of stations in geodetic surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstl.1855.0003
- The paper
- Airy, G. B. (1855). III. On the computation of the effect of the attraction of mountain-masses, as disturbing the apparent astronomical latitude of stations in geodetic surveys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1855.0003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.