The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactobacillus amylovorus, a New Starch-Hydrolyzing Species from Cattle Waste-Corn Fermentations
Abstract
Several starch-hydrolyzing strains of Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901 were isolated from cattle waste-corn fermentations. The isolates were facultatively anaerobic, gram-positive, nonmotile, nonsporeforming, rod-shaped organisms that grew singly and in short chains, produced lactic acid and small amounts of acetic acid but no gas from glucose, and did not exhibit oxidase-, catalase-, or nitrate-reducing activities. Growth occurred at 45°C but not at 15°C. dl-Lactic acid was synthesized from glucose. An extracellular amylolytic enzyme was formed. The organisms fermented amygdalin, cellobiose, esculin, fructose, galactose, glucose, maltose, mannose, salicin, starch, sucrose, and trehalose. Some strains fermented mannitol and lactose. Arabinose, gluconate, melezitose, melibiose, raffinose, rham-nose, ribose, and xylose were not fermented. The average guanine-plus-cytosine content of the deoxyribonucleic acid was 40.4 mol%. Reassociation values of 15% or less were obtained with the deoxyribonucleic acids of the starch hydrolyzers and those of the type strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus (Moro) Hansen and Mocquot 1970; Lactobacillus jensenii Gasser, Mandel, and Rogosa 1970; and Lactobacillus leichmanii (Henneberg) Bergey et al. 1923. The new species was differentiated from the three recognized species on the basis of starch fermentation, vitamin requirements, guanine-plus-cytosine contents, and stereoisomerism of lactic acid produced. It was concluded that these organisms represent strains of a hitherto unrecognized species for which the name Lactobacillus amylovorus is proposed. The type strain of L. amylovorus is NRRL B-4540.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311
A selective medium for the isolation and enumeration of oral and fecal lactobacilli
Rogosa, M., Mitchell, J. A., & Wiseman, R. F. (1951) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.62.1.132-133.1951 · Cited by 653
Cited by
Zheng, J., Wittouck, S., Salvetti, E., Franz, C. M. A. P., Harris, H. M. B., Mattarelli, P., O’Toole, P. W., Pot, B., Vandamme, P., Walter, J., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 · Cited by 3,313
The lactic acid bacteria: A literature survey
Carr, F. J., Chill, D., & Maida, N. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040-840291046759 · Cited by 724
The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_3731 · Cited by 382
Direct lactic acid fermentation: Focus on simultaneous saccharification and lactic acid production
John, R. P., G.S., A., Nampoothiri, K. M., & Pandey, A. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.004 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- NAKAMURA, L. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1981-01-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-63
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2066784061
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactobacillus amylovorus, a New Starch-Hydrolyzing Species from Cattle Waste-Corn Fermentations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-31-1-56
- The paper
- NAKAMURA, L. K. (1981). Lactobacillus amylovorus, a New Starch-Hydrolyzing Species from Cattle Waste-Corn Fermentations. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-31-1-56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.