Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reclassification of the Genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the Basis of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology, with Proposals for the New Species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa

MUTTERS, R., IHM, P., POHL, S., FREDERIKSEN, W., MANNHEIM, W.·1985·International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA hybridization was used to determine the genetic relationships among a variety of previously established or proposed species of Pasteurella and their positions within the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981. Our results indicated that the genus Pasteurella sensu stricto, which can be separated from the Actinobacillus group, consists of at least the following 11 species: Pasteurella multocida, with three subspecies (P. multocida subsp. multocida, P. multocida subsp. septica, and P. multocida subsp. gallicida); Pasteurella dagmatis sp. nov., containing organisms previously labeled Pasteurella “gas,” Pasteurella new species 1, or Pasteurella pneumotropica type Henriksen; Pasteurella gallinarum; Pasteurella canis sp. nov., previously labeled P. multocida biotype 6 or “dog type” strains; Pasteurella stomatis sp. nov., which contains Pasteurella strains isolated from dogs and cats; Pasteurella avium (Hinz and Kunjara) Mutters et al. 1985; Pasteurella volantium Mutters et al. 1985, a new species consisting of V-factor-requiring strains that occur in humans and birds; Pasteurella anatis sp. nov.; Pasteurella langaa sp. nov., containing strains previously designated taxa 1 and 4 of Bisgaard; and two new species, which were provisionally designated Pasteurella species A and Pasteurella species B. The previously recognized taxa Pasteurella ureae, Pasteurella haemolytica biotypes A and T, Pasteurella testudinis, and P. pneumotropica biotypes Jawetz and Heyl do not belong to the genus Pasteurella but are more closely related to the Actinobacillus group. The exact taxonomic positions of Pasteurella aerogenes, P. multocida biotype 1, group HB-5, “Pasteurella piscicida,” the SP group, and the bovine lymphangitis group are still unknown, but these organisms do not belong to the genus Pasteurella.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00207713-35-3-309

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
MUTTERS, R., IHM, P., POHL, S., FREDERIKSEN, W., & MANNHEIM, W.
Venue
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
Published
1985-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
309-322
ISSN
  • 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2102
OpenAlex
W2013375772
Cited by
321
References
11
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reclassification of the Genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the Basis of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology, with Proposals for the New Species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-35-3-309
The paper
MUTTERS, R., IHM, P., POHL, S., FREDERIKSEN, W., & MANNHEIM, W. (1985). Reclassification of the Genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the Basis of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology, with Proposals for the New Species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-35-3-309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.