The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proposal To Reclassify Leuconostoc oenos as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.] gen. nov., comb. nov.
Abstract
Wine strains belonging to the genus Leuconostoc were classified as Leuconostoc oenos by Garvie in 1967, and this name was confirmed on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names in 1980. L. oenos is distinguished from other Leuconostoc spp. by its growth in acidic media, by its requirement for a growth factor in tomato juice, and by a number of carbohydrate fermentation characteristics. In addition, the results of a total soluble cell protein analysis, an electrophoretic analysis of NAD-dependent D-(-)-lactate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, and alcohol dehydrogenase, and an analysis of cross-reactivity with anti-glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and anti-NAD-dependent D-(-)-lactate dehydrogenase performed with other Leuconostoc spp. clearly indicated that L. oenos should be distinguished from the other Leuconostoc species. Phylogenetic studies, in particular 16S and 23S rRNA sequencing studies, have revealed that L. oenos represents a distinct subline that is separate from other Leuconostoc spp. and lactic acid bacteria. In view of the phenotypic and phylogenetic distinctiveness of L. oenos, we propose that this species should be assigned to a new genus as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.] gen. nov., comb. nov. The type strain of O. oeni is NCDO 1674 (= ATCC 23179).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources1
Hofvendahl, K., & Hahn–Hägerdal, B. (2000) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/s0141-0229(99)00155-6 · Cited by 895
The lactic acid bacteria: A literature survey
Carr, F. J., Chill, D., & Maida, N. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040-840291046759 · Cited by 724
Bioutilisation of whey for lactic acid production
PANESAR, P., KENNEDY, J., GANDHI, D., & BUNKO, K. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.035 · Cited by 373
The ‘buttery’ attribute of wine—diacetyl—desirability, spoilage and beyond
Bartowsky, E. J., & Henschke, P. A. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.013 · Cited by 370
Leuconostoc, characteristics, use in dairy technology and prospects in functional foods
Hemme, D., & Foucaud-Scheunemann, C. (2004) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.10.005 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- DICKS, L. M. T., DELLAGLIO, F., & COLLINS, M. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 395-397
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2138730401
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proposal To Reclassify Leuconostoc oenos as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.] gen. nov., comb. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-45-2-395
- The paper
- DICKS, L. M. T., DELLAGLIO, F., & COLLINS, M. D. (1995). Proposal To Reclassify Leuconostoc oenos as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.] gen. nov., comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
