Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intraspecific Variation in Small-Subunit rRNA Sequences in GenBank: Why Single Sequences May Not Adequately Represent Prokaryotic Taxa

CLAYTON, R. A., SUTTON, G., HINKLE, P. S., BULT, C., FIELDS, C.·1995·International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology

Abstract

Small-subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) sequencing is a powerful tool to detect, identify, and classify prokaryotic organisms, and there is currently an explosion of SSU rRNA sequencing in the microbiology community. We report unexpectedly high levels of intraspecific variation (within and between strains) of prokaryote SSU rRNA sequences deposited in GenBank. A total of 82% of the prokaryote species with two published SSU rRNA sequences had more variable positions than a 0.1% random sequencing error would predict, and 48% of these sequence pairs had more variable positions than predicted by a 1.0% random sequencing error. Other sources of sequence variability must account for some of this intraspecific variation. Given these results, phylogenetic studies and biodiversity estimates obtained by using prokaryotic SSU rRNA sequences cannot proceed under the assumption that rRNA sequences of single operons from single isolates adequately represent their taxa. Sequencing SSU rRNA molecules from multiple operons and multiple isolates is highly recommended to obtain meaningful phylogenetic hypotheses, as is careful attention to accurate strain identification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00207713-45-3-595

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
CLAYTON, R. A., SUTTON, G., HINKLE, P. S., BULT, C., & FIELDS, C.
Venue
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
595-599
ISSN
  • 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2102
OpenAlex
W2134256117
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspecific Variation in Small-Subunit rRNA Sequences in GenBank: Why Single Sequences May Not Adequately Represent Prokaryotic Taxa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-45-3-595
The paper
CLAYTON, R. A., SUTTON, G., HINKLE, P. S., BULT, C., & FIELDS, C. (1995). Intraspecific Variation in Small-Subunit rRNA Sequences in GenBank: Why Single Sequences May Not Adequately Represent Prokaryotic Taxa. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-3-595

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.