The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis.
Abstract
Rhizobium, Agrobacterium and Allorhizobium are genera within the bacterial family Rhizobiaceae, together with Sinorhizobium. The species of Agrobacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (syn. Agrobacterium radiobacter), Agrobacterium rhizogenes, Agrobacterium rubi and Agrobacterium vitis, together with Allorhizobium undicola, form a monophyletic group with all Rhizobium species, based on comparative 16S rDNA analyses. Agrobacterium is an artificial genus comprising plant-pathogenic species. The monophyletic nature of Agrobacterium, Allorhizobium and Rhizobium and their common phenotypic generic circumscription support their amalgamation into a single genus, Rhizobium. Agrobacterium tumefaciens was conserved as the type species of Agrobacterium, but the epithet radiobacter would take precedence as Rhizobium radiobacter in the revised genus. The proposed new combinations are Rhizobium radiobacter, Rhizobium rhizogenes, Rhizobium rubi, Rhizobium undicola and Rhizobium vitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
(1993) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023 · Cited by 11,229
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics
Wayne, L. G., Moore, W. E. C., Stackebrandt, E., Kandler, O., Colwell, R. R., Krichevsky, M. I., Truper, H. G., Murray, R. G. E., Grimont, P. A. D., Brenner, D. J., et al. (1987) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-37-4-463 · Cited by 7,332
STACKEBRANDT, E., & GOEBEL, B. M. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 · Cited by 7,083
PAUP (phylogenetic analysis using parsimony)
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6754-9_12413 · Cited by 4,412
Cited by
Agrobacterium -Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool
Gelvin, S. B. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Brencic, A., & Winans, S. C. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.155-194.2005 · Cited by 434
Phylogenies of atpD and recA support the small subunit rRNA-based classification of rhizobia.
Gaunt, M. W., Turner, S. L., Rigottier-Gois, L., Lloyd-Macgilp, S. A., & Young, J. P. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-6-2037 · Cited by 408
Self-citationRon, M., Kajala, K., Pauluzzi, G., Wang, D., Reynoso, M. A., Zumstein, K., Garcha, J., Winte, S., Masson, H., Inagaki, S., et al. (2014) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.114.239392 · Cited by 389
Bacterial Associations with Legumes
Peix, A., Ramírez-Bahena, M. H., Velázquez, E., & Bedmar, E. J. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2014.897899 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, J. M., Kuykendall, L. D., Martínez-Romero, E., Kerr, A., & Sawada, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-103
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W1703170329
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 31.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-51-1-89
- The paper
- Young, J. M., Kuykendall, L. D., Martínez-Romero, E., Kerr, A., & Sawada, H. (2001). A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-1-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
