The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Associations with Legumes
Abstract
Legumes form a large group of plants that constitute the third largest family of angiosperms, including near 20,000 species and 750 genera. Most of them have the ability to establish symbioses with diazotrophic bacteria, collectively known as rhizobia, which induce root nodules where biological nitrogen fixation takes place, conferring legumes a relevant ecological advantage. This group of bacteria that for many years was thought to be formed by a scarce number of genera and species within alpha proteobacteria, shows nowadays an important genetic diversity including species phylogenetically divergent both in core and symbiotic genes sequences. Together with rhizobia, other endophytic bacteria are present in legume nodules coexisting with rhizobial strains and their ecological role remains unknown in most cases, but they likely have an effect in plant health, plant growth or even in the rhizobia-legume symbiosis. In this review we present an overview of the associations of bacteria with legumes, the current available knowledge on the phylogenetic diversity of both rhizobia and endophytic bacteria inhabiting root nodules, and the symbiotic features used to define symbiovars in rhizobia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.
(1985) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-102-1-151_3 · Cited by 4,886
Buddingh, G. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1975.24.550 · Cited by 2,481
Oldroyd, G. E. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2990 · Cited by 1,686
Structural basis of biological nitrogen fixation
Rees, D. C., Akif Tezcan, F., Haynes, C. A., Walton, M. Y., Andrade, S., Einsle, O., & Howard, J. B. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2004.1539 · Cited by 1,120
Molecular Basis of Symbiotic Promiscuity
Perret, X., Staehelin, C., & Broughton, W. J. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.1.180-201.2000 · Cited by 1,037
Dénarié, J., Debellé, F., & Promé, J.-C. (1996) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002443 · Cited by 989
Complete Genomic Sequence of Nitrogen-fixing Symbiotic Bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110
Kaneko, T. (2002) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/9.6.189 · Cited by 858
Fuller, D. Q. (2007) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcm048 · Cited by 780
Nodulation of legumes by members of the β-subclass of Proteobacteria
Moulin, L., Munive, A., Dreyfus, B., & Boivin-Masson, C. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35082070 · Cited by 703
Young, J. M., Kuykendall, L. D., Martínez-Romero, E., Kerr, A., & Sawada, H. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-1-89 · Cited by 621
Cited by
Oleńska, E., Małek, W., Wójcik, M., Swiecicka, I., Thijs, S., & Vangronsveld, J. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Peix, A., Ramírez-Bahena, M. H., Velázquez, E., & Bedmar, E. J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-10-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 17-42
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2017239852
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 107
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Associations with Legumes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352689.2014.897899
- The paper
- Peix, A., Ramírez-Bahena, M. H., Velázquez, E., & Bedmar, E. J. (2015). Bacterial Associations with Legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.897899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.