The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic study of marine Cytophaga-like bacteria: proposal for Tenacibaculum gen. nov. with Tenacibaculum maritimum comb. nov. and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum comb. nov., and description of Tenacibaculum mesophilum sp. nov. and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum sp. nov.
Abstract
Bacterial strains were isolated from sponge and green algae which were collected on the coast of Japan and Palau. The phylogenetic relationships of these isolates among marine species of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides complex were analysed by using their gyrB nucleotide sequences and translated peptide sequences (GyrB) in addition to 16S rDNA sequences. These isolates were closely related to the previously characterized marine Flexibacter species, [Flexibacter] maritimus and [Flexibacter] ovolyticus. These Flexibacter species are distantly related to Flexibacter flexilis, the type species of the genus Flexibacter, and phylogenetically belong to the family Flavobacteriaceae (according to analysis using both 16S rDNA and GyrB sequences). Their phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic characteristics prompted the proposal that these two species should be transferred to the new genus Tenacibaculum, as Tenacibaculum maritimum and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum, respectively. Two additional new species of the genus Tenacibaculum, Tenacibaculum mesophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. (= MBIC 1140T = IFO 16307T) and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov. (= MBIC 4355T = IFO 16310T), which were isolated from sponges and macroalgae, are also reported. For taxonomic considerations at the species level, the resolution of gyrB sequences was superior to that of 16S rDNA sequences, and the grouping based on the gyrB phylogram was consistent with DNA-DNA hybridization results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study
Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A., & Lane, D. J. (1991) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991 · Cited by 11,934
STACKEBRANDT, E., & GOEBEL, B. M. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 · Cited by 7,083
EZAKI, T., HASHIMOTO, Y., & YABUUCHI, E. (1989) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-39-3-224 · Cited by 3,261
How Close Is Close: 16S rRNA Sequence Identity May Not Be Sufficient To Guarantee Species Identity
Fox, G. E., Wisotzkey, J. D., & Jurtshuk, P. (1992) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-42-1-166 · Cited by 1,300
A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project)
Maidak, B. L., Cole, J. R., Parker, C. T., Garrity, G. M., Larsen, N., Li, B., Lilburn, T. G., McCaughey, M. J., Olsen, G. J., Overbeek, R., et al. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.171 · Cited by 895
Evolution in bacteria: Evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes
Ochman, H., & Wilson, A. C. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02111283 · Cited by 781
Cited by
Oberbeckmann, S., Osborn, A. M., & Duhaime, M. B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159289 · Cited by 572
Tenacibaculosis infection in marine fish caused by Tenacibaculum maritimum: a review
Avendaño-Herrera, R., Toranzo, A., & Magariños, B. (2006) · Diseases of Aquatic Organisms · doi:10.3354/dao071255 · Cited by 310
Diversity of Bacteroidetes in high‐altitude saline evaporitic basins in northern Chile
Dorador, C., Meneses, D., Urtuvia, V., Demergasso, C., Vila, I., Witzel, K., & Imhoff, J. F. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2008jg000837 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Suzuki, M., Nakagawa, Y., Harayama, S., & Yamamoto, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1639-1652
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2133271064
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic study of marine Cytophaga-like bacteria: proposal for Tenacibaculum gen. nov. with Tenacibaculum maritimum comb. nov. and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum comb. nov., and description of Tenacibaculum mesophilum sp. nov. and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum sp. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-51-5-1639
- The paper
- Suzuki, M., Nakagawa, Y., Harayama, S., & Yamamoto, S. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic study of marine Cytophaga-like bacteria: proposal for Tenacibaculum gen. nov. with Tenacibaculum maritimum comb. nov. and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum comb. nov., and description of Tenacibaculum mesophilum sp. nov. and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-5-1639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
