The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications
Abstract
The coagulase-negative staphylococci and, in particular, Staphylococcus epidermidis, have emerged as major nosocomial pathogens associated with infections of implanted medical devices. These organisms, which are among the most prevalent bacteria of the human skin and mucous membrane microflora, present unique problems in the diagnosis and treatment of infections involving biofilm formation on implanted biomaterials. Epidemiological data that address whether invasive S. epidermidis strains can be traced to commensal organisms or an endemic occurrence of distinct strains with enhanced virulence have important implications for the implementation of appropriate infection control measures. An extracellular polysaccharide adhesin represents a key virulence determinant in S. epidermidis and is required for biofilm formation. Production of this adhesin, which is encoded by the ica operon, is subject to phase variable regulation (ON <---> OFF switching). Recent advances in understanding the molecular events controlling polysaccharide adhesin synthesis and the potential clinical implications of its phase variable regulation are outlined. Further research in this area may contribute to the development of novel strategies for therapeutic intervention. Finally, in addition to antibiotic prophylaxis, preventive strategies to control S. epidermidis medical device-related infections are focusing on the development of improved biomaterials and physical electrical barriers to impede bacterial colonisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus
Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A., Ganesh, V. K., & Höök, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3161 · Cited by 1,533
Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus
McCarthy, H., Rudkin, J. K., Black, N. S., Gallagher, L., O'Neill, E., & O'Gara, J. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 · Cited by 426
Self-citationIncreased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2
Colon, G., Ward, B. C., & Webster, T. J. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30789 · Cited by 425
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Infections
Rogers, K. L., Fey, P. D., & Rupp, M. E. (2009) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.001 · Cited by 401
Rohde, H., Frankenberger, S., Zähringer, U., & Mack, D. (2010) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.005 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- O'GARA, J. P., & HUMPHREYS, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 582-587
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W1716781317
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-582
- The paper
- O'GARA, J. P., & HUMPHREYS, H. (2001). Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.