CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,606Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsBiocrusts and Microbial EcologyProtist diversity and phylogeny

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generic Assignments, Strain Histories and Properties of Pure Cultures of Cyanobacteria

Rippka, Rosmarie, Stanier, Roger Y., Deruelles, Josette, Herdman, Michael, Waterbury, John B.·1979·Microbiology
DOI 10.1099/00221287-111-1-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: On the basis of a comparative study of 178 strains of cyanobacteria, representative of this group of prokaryotes, revised definitions of many genera are proposed. Revisions are designed to permit the generic identification of cultures, often difficult through use of the field-based system of phycological classification. The differential characters proposed are both constant and readily determinable in cultured material. The 22 genera recognized are placed in five sections, each distinguished by a particular pattern of structure and development. Generic descriptions are accompanied by strain histories, brief accounts of strain properties, and illustrations; one or more reference strains are proposed for each genus. The collection on which this analysis was based has been deposited in the American Type Culture Collection, where strains will be listed under the generic designations proposed here.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-111-1-1

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7,606

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rippka, R., Stanier, R. Y., Deruelles, J., Herdman, M., & Waterbury, J. B.
Affiliations
Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Waterbury, John B.
ORCID
Herdman, Michael
Venue
Microbiology
Publisher
Microbiology Society
Published
1979-03-01
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
1-61
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
DOI
10.1099/00221287-111-1-1
OpenAlex
W2080791625
Cited by
7,606
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 169 · 2025: 254 · 2024: 245 · 2023: 280 · 2022: 312 · 2021: 358 · 2020: 373 · 2019: 367 · 2018: 325 · 2017: 328 · 2016: 288 · 2015: 313 · 2014: 278 · 2013: 254 · 2012: 257
FWCI
72.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Microbiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
cyanobacteria, generic revision, bacterial taxonomy, strain history, reference strains, differential characters, prokaryotic taxonomy, American Type Culture Collection, axenic culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review