The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Successful Treatment of Experimental Escherichia coli Infections in Mice Using Phage: its General Superiority over Antibiotics
Abstract
Anti-K 1 phages were more active in vitro and in vivo against an 018:K1:H7 ColV+ Escherichia coli strain, designated MW, than were other phages. A single intramuscular dose of one anti-K1 phage was more effective than multiple intramuscular does of tetracycline, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, or trimethoprim plus sulphafurazole in curing mice of a potentially lethal intramuscularly or intracerebrally induced infection of MW; it was at least as effective as multiple intramuscular doses of streptomycin. When MW and the phage were inoculated into different gastrocnemius muscles of the same mice, a rapid reduction in numbers of MW organisms occurred in the MW-inoculated muscle and in other tissues; the numbers of phage particles in the MW-inoculated muscle increased rapidly and greatly. MW failed to proliferate in the brains of intracerebrally infected mice that had been inoculated intramuscularly with the phage at the same time; many more phage particles were found in the brains of these mice than in other sites. The few phage-resistant mutants of MW found in the phage-treated mich were K1-; previous studies had shown such mutants to be of greatly reduced virulence. The phage administered intramuscularly 3-5 d before challenge with a potentially lethal intramuscularly induced infection of MW was protective, the protective effect varying between phage propagated on different bacterial strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schooley, R. T., Biswas, B., Gill, J. J., Hernandez-Morales, A., Lancaster, J., Lessor, L., Barr, J. J., Reed, S. L., Rohwer, F., Benler, S., et al. (2017) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00954-17 · Cited by 1,254
Formulation, stabilisation and encapsulation of bacteriophage for phage therapy
Malik, D. J., Sokolov, I. J., Vinner, G. K., Mancuso, F., Cinquerrui, S., Vladisavljevic, G. T., Clokie, M. R. J., Garton, N. J., Stapley, A. G. F., & Kirpichnikova, A. (2017) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.05.014 · Cited by 594
Resistance Development to Bacteriophages Occurring during Bacteriophage Therapy
Oechslin, F. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v10070351 · Cited by 594
Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals
Allen, H. K., Levine, U. Y., Looft, T., Bandrick, M., & Casey, T. A. (2013) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.001 · Cited by 320
Phage therapy: Facts and fiction
Skurnik, M., & Strauch, E. (2006) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.09.002 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, H. W., & Huggins, M. B.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1982-02-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-318
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2101640832
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Successful Treatment of Experimental Escherichia coli Infections in Mice Using Phage: its General Superiority over Antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-128-2-307
- The paper
- Smith, H. W., & Huggins, M. B. (1982). Successful Treatment of Experimental Escherichia coli Infections in Mice Using Phage: its General Superiority over Antibiotics. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-128-2-307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.