Cited by 594Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Formulation, stabilisation and encapsulation of bacteriophage for phage therapy

Open access
Malik, Danish J., Sokolov, Ilya J., Vinner, Gurinder K., Mancuso, Francesco, Cinquerrui, Salvatore, Vladisavljevic, Goran T., Clokie, Martha R.J., Garton, Natalie J. +2 more·2017·Advances in Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

Against a backdrop of global antibiotic resistance and increasing awareness of the importance of the human microbiota, there has been resurgent interest in the potential use of bacteriophages for therapeutic purposes, known as phage therapy. A number of phage therapy phase I and II clinical trials have concluded, and shown phages don't present significant adverse safety concerns. These clinical trials used simple phage suspensions without any formulation and phage stability was of secondary concern. Phages have a limited stability in solution, and undergo a significant drop in phage titre during processing and storage which is unacceptable if phages are to become regulated pharmaceuticals, where stable dosage and well defined pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are de rigueur. Animal studies have shown that the efficacy of phage therapy outcomes depend on the phage concentration (i.e. the dose) delivered at the site of infection, and their ability to target and kill bacteria, arresting bacterial growth and clearing the infection. In addition, in vitro and animal studies have shown the importance of using phage cocktails rather than single phage preparations to achieve better therapy outcomes. The in vivo reduction of phage concentration due to interactions with host antibodies or other clearance mechanisms may necessitate repeated dosing of phages, or sustained release approaches. Modelling of phage-bacterium population dynamics reinforces these points. Surprisingly little attention has been devoted to the effect of formulation on phage therapy outcomes, given the need for phage cocktails, where each phage within a cocktail may require significantly different formulation to retain a high enough infective dose. This review firstly looks at the clinical needs and challenges (informed through a review of key animal studies evaluating phage therapy) associated with treatment of acute and chronic infections and the drivers for phage encapsulation. An important driver for formulation and encapsulation is shelf life and storage of phage to ensure reproducible dosages. Other drivers include formulation of phage for encapsulation in micro- and nanoparticles for effective delivery, encapsulation in stimuli responsive systems for triggered controlled or sustained release at the targeted site of infection. Encapsulation of phage (e.g. in liposomes) may also be used to increase the circulation time of phage for treating systemic infections, for prophylactic treatment or to treat intracellular infections. We then proceed to document approaches used in the published literature on the formulation and stabilisation of phage for storage and encapsulation of bacteriophage in micro- and nanostructured materials using freeze drying (lyophilization), spray drying, in emulsions e.g. ointments, polymeric microparticles, nanoparticles and liposomes. As phage therapy moves forward towards Phase III clinical trials, the review concludes by looking at promising new approaches for micro- and nanoencapsulation of phages and how these may address gaps in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cis.2017.05.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engineering strategies to address limitations of phage delivery platforms, such as PEGylation, polymer encapsulation, immune-evasive capsid mutations, and biomaterial carriers, are actively being developed.

    “Engineering strategies to address these limitations, such as (Polyethylene glycol) PEGylation, polymer encapsulation, immune-evasive capsid mutations, and biomaterial carriers, are actively being developed [101–103]”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [103]

    Section 4.7 (page unavailable) documents polymer encapsulation of phages, and section 4.9 discusses PEGylation in the context of phage-containing liposome carriers. The paper also discusses other carrier materials for delivery, but the passages found do not support immune-evasive capsid mutations as a developing strategy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 238

  1. O'Neill J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. Rev Antimicrob Resist 2016:1-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jpha.2015.11.005. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Moellering RC. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2377-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMp1002530. · DOI
  3. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid- mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:161-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. · DOI
  4. Coates AR, Halls G, Hu Y. Novel classes of antibiotics or more of the same? Br J Pharmacol 2011;163:184-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011. 01250.x. · DOI
  5. Czaplewski L, Bax R, Clokie M, Dawson M, Fairhead H, Fischetti VA, et al. Alternatives to antibiotics -a pipeline portfolio review. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:239-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00466-1. · DOI
  6. Wittebole X, De Roock S, Opal SM. A historical overview of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 2014;5:226-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.25991. · DOI
  7. Young R, Gill JJ. Phage therapy redux -what is to be done? Science 2015;350:1163-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8222. · DOI
  8. Levin BR, Bull JJ. Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage therapy. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:166-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro822. · DOI
  9. Cairns BJ, Timms AR, Jansen VAA, Connerton IF, Payne RJH. Quantitative models of in vitro bacteriophage-host dynamics and their application to phage therapy. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000253. · DOI
  10. Bull JJ, Gill JJ. The habits of highly effective phages: population dynamics as a framework for identifying therapeutic phages. Front Microbiol 2014;5:1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00618. · DOI
  11. Hadas H, Einav M, Fishov I, Zaritsky A. bateriophage T4 development depends on the physiology of its host Escherichia coli. Microbiology 1997;143:179-85.
  12. Gill JJ, Hyman P. Phage choice, isolation and preparation for phage therapy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2010;11:2014.
  13. Weber-Dabrowska B, Jonczyk-Matysiak E, Zaczek M, Lobocka M, Lusiak- Szelachowska M, Gorski A. Bacteriophage procurement for therapeutic purposes. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01177. · DOI
  14. Mattila S, Ruotsalainen P, Jalasvuori M. On-demand isolation of bacteriophages against drug-resistant bacteria for personalized phage therapy. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01271. · DOI
  15. Sutherland IW, Hughes KA, Skillman LC, Tait K. The interaction of phage and biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004;232:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 1097(04)00041-2. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cornelissen A, Ceyssens PJ, T'Syen J, van Praet H, Noben JP, Shaburova OV, et al. The t7-related pseudomonas putida phage φ15 displays virion-associated biofilm degradation properties. PLoS One 2011;6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0018597. · DOI
  17. Pires DP, Oliveira H, Melo LDR, Sillankorva S, Azeredo J. Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases: their diversity and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;100:2141-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7247-0. · DOI
  18. Gutiérrez D, Vandenheuvel D, Martínez B, Rodríguez A, Lavigne R, García P. Two phages, phiIPLA-RODI and phiIPLA-C1C, lyse mono-and dual-species staphylo- coccal biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:3336-48. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1128/AEM.03560-14. · DOI
  19. Khalifa L, Brosh Y, Gelman D, Coppenhagen-Glazer S, Beyth S, Poradosu-Cohen R, et al. Targeting Enterococcus faecalis biofilms with phage therapy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:2696-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00096-15. · DOI
  20. Smith HW, Huggins MB, Shaw KM. The control of experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves by means of bacteriophages. J Gen Microbiol 1987;133:1111-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-133-5-1111. · DOI
  21. Nakai T, Sugimoto R, Park K-H, Matsuoka S, Mori K, Nishioka T, et al. Protective effects of bacteriophage on experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in yel- lowtail. Dis Aquat Organ 1999;37:33-41.
  22. Smith HW, Huggins MB. Effectiveness of phages in treating experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves, piglets and lambs. J Gen Microbiol 1983;129:2659-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-8-2659. · DOI
  23. Atterbury RJ, Van Bergen MAP, Ortiz F, Lovell MA, Harris JA, De Boer A, et al. Bacteriophage therapy to reduce Salmonella colonization of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:4543-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00049-07. · DOI
  24. Peltomaa R, López-Perolio I, Benito-Peña E, Barderas R, Moreno-Bondi MC. Application of bacteriophages in sensor development. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016;408:1805-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9087-2. · DOI
  25. Ulett GC, Totsika M, Schaale K, Carey AJ, Sweet MJ, Schembri MA. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence and innate immune responses during urinary tract in- fection. Curr Opin Microbiol 2013;16:100-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib. 2013.01.005. · DOI
  26. Debarbieux L, Leduc D, Maura D, Morello E, Criscuolo A, Grossi O, et al. Bacteriophages can treat and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. J Infect Dis 2010;201:1096-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651135. · DOI
  27. Alemayehu D, Casey PG, Mcauliffe O, Guinane CM, Martin JG, Shanahan F, et al. Bacteriophage phiMR299-2 and phiNH-4 can eliminate Psuedomonas aeruginosa in the murine lung and on cystic fibrosis lung airway. MBio 2012;3:1-9. http://dx. doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00029-12.Editor. · DOI
  28. Morello E, Saussereau E, Maura D, Huerre M, Touqui L, Debarbieux L. Pulmonary bacteriophage therapy on pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis strains: first steps towards treatment and prevention. PLoS One 2011;6. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0016963. · DOI
  29. Capparelli R, Parlato M, Borriello G, Salvatore P, Iannelli D. Experimental phage therapy against Staphylococcus aureus in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:2765-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01513-06. · DOI
  30. Smith HW, Huggins MB. Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli in- fections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics. Microbiology 1982;128:307-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-128-2-307. · DOI
  31. Singla S, Harjai K, Katare OP, Chhibber S. Bacteriophage-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier: improved pharmacokinetics mediates effective resolution of Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced lobar pneumonia. J Infect Dis 2015;212:325-34. http://dx. doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv029. · DOI
  32. Chhibber S, Kaur S, Kumari S. Therapeutic potential of bacteriophage in treating Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055-mediated lobar pneumonia in mice. J Med Microbiol 2008;57:1508-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.2008/002873-0. · DOI
  33. Wills QF, Kerrigan C, Soothill JS. Experimental bacteriophage protection against Staphylococcus aureus abscesses in a rabbit model experimental bacteriophage protection against Staphylococcus aureus abscesses in a rabbit model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1220-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.3.1220. · DOI
  34. McVay CS, Velásquez M, Fralick JA. Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn wound model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:1934-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01028-06. · DOI
  35. Sarker SA, Sultana S, Reuteler G, Moine D, Descombes P, Charton F, et al. Oral phage therapy of acute bacterial diarrhea with two coliphage preparations: a randomized trial in children from Bangladesh. EBioMedicine 2016;4:124-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.12.023. · DOI
  36. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ CMR.15.2.167. · DOI
  37. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:95-108.
  38. Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA, O'May GA, William Costerton J, Shirtliff ME. Polymicrobial interactions: impact on pathogenesis and human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2012;25:193-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00013-11. · DOI
  39. Singla S, Harjai K, Raza K, Wadhwa S, Katare OP, Chhibber S. Phospholipid ve- sicles encapsulated bacteriophage: a novel approach to enhance phage biodis- tribution. J Virol Methods 2016;236:68-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet. 2016.07.002. · DOI
  40. Chan BK, Abedon ST. Bacteriophage and their enzymes in biofilm control. Curr Pharm Des 2015;21:85-99.
  41. Furusawa T, Iwano H, Hiyashimizu Y, Matsubara K, Higuchi H, Nagahata H, et al. Phage Therapy Is Effective in a Mouse Model of Bacterial Equine Keratitis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016;82:5332-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.01166-16. · DOI
  42. Carmody LA, Gill JJ, Summer EJ, Sajjan US, Gonzalez CF, Young RF, et al. Efficacy of bacteriophage therapy in a model of Burkholderia cenocepacia pulmonary in- fection. J Infect Dis 2010;201:264-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/649227. · DOI
  43. Martin RM, Cao J, Brisse S, Passet V, Wu W, Zhao L, et al. Molecular epidemiology of colonizing and infecting isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. mSphere 2016;1:1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00261-16. · DOI
  44. Jassal M, Bishai WR. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70260-3. · DOI
  45. Russell DG, Barry CE, Flynn JL. Tuberculosis: what we don't know can, and does, hurt us. Science (80-) 2010;328:852-6.
  46. Nieth A, Verseux C, Barnert S, Süss R, Römer W. A first step toward liposome- mediated intracellular bacteriophage therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2015:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.1043125. · DOI
  47. Nieth A, Verseux C, Römer W. A question of attire: dressing up bacteriophage therapy for the battle against antibiotic-resistant intracellular bacteria. Springer Sci Rev 2015;3:1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0027-x. · DOI
  48. Guest JF, Ayoub N, Mcilwraith T, Uchegbu I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D, et al. Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12603. · DOI
  49. Lindholm C, Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: combining ef- fectiveness and efficiency. Int Wound J 2016;13:5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ iwj.12623. · DOI
  50. Clinton A, Carter T. Chronic wound biofilms: pathogenesis and potential therapies. Lab Med 2015;46:277-84.
  51. Wiegand C, Abel M, Ruth P, Hipler UC. HaCaT keratinocytes in co-culture with Staphylococcus aureus can be protected from bacterial damage by polihexanide. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:730-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X. 2009.00536.x. · DOI
  52. Peterson LR. Review. Squeezing the antibiotic balloon: the impact of antimicrobial classes on emerging resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect Suppl 2005;11:4-16. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01238.x. · DOI
  53. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJG, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:132-73. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis346. · DOI
  54. Nale JY, Shan J, Hickenbotham PT, Fawley WN, Wilcox MH, Clokie MRJ. Diverse temperate bacteriophage carriage in Clostridium difficile 027 strains. PLoS One 2012;7:1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037263. · DOI
  55. Curtis V, Cairncross S. Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2003;3:275-81.
  56. Abdulamir AS, Sabah J, Bakar Fatimah A. Novel approach of using a cocktail of designed bacteriophages against gut pathogenic E. coli for bacterial load biocon- trol. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2014;13:1-11.
  57. Yen M, Cairns LS, Camilli A, Zuckerman JN, Rombo L, Fisch A, et al. A cocktail of three virulent bacteriophages prevents Vibrio cholerae infection in animal models. Nat Commun 2017;8:14187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14187. · DOI
  58. Wall SK, Zhang J, Rostagno MH, Ebner PD. Phage therapy to reduce preprocessing Salmonella infections in market-weight swine. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:48-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00785-09. · DOI
  59. Oliveira M, Viñas I, Colàs P, Anguera M, Usall J, Abadias M. Effectiveness of a bacteriophage in reducing Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut fruits and fruit juices. Food Microbiol 2014;38:137-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.08. 018. · DOI
  60. Hua Zou WW. Phage therapy: promising for H. pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Open Access 2013;2:10-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000112. · DOI
  61. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in de- veloping countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013;382:209-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(13)60844-2. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Payne RJH, Jansen V. Understanding bacteriophage therapy as a density-depen- dent kinetic process. J Theor Biol 2001;208:37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ jtbi.2000.2198. · DOI
  63. Tanji Y, Shimada T, Fukudomi H, Miyanaga K, Nakai Y, Unno H. Therapeutic use of phage cocktail for controlling Escherichia coli O157:H7 in gastrointestinal tract of mice. J Biosci Bioeng 2005;100:280-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.100.280. · DOI
  64. Leung CY, Weitz JS. Synergistic elimination of bacteria by phage and the immune system. bioRxiv 2016:57927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/057927. · DOI
  65. Smith HW, Huggins MB. Successful Treatment of Experimental Escherichia coli Infections in Mice Using Phage: its General Superiority over Antibiotics. J Gen Microbiol 1982;128:307-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-128-2-307. · DOI
  66. Biswas B, Adhya S, Washart P, Paul B, Trostel AN, Powell B, et al. Bacteriophage therapy rescues mice bacteremic from a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 2002;70:204-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ IAI.70.1.204. · DOI
  67. Cerveny KE, DePaola A, Duckworth DH, Gulig PA. Phage therapy of local and systemic disease caused by Vibrio vulnificus in iron-dextran-treated mice. Infect Immun 2002;70:6251-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.11.6251. · DOI
  68. Barrow P, Lovell M. Use of lytic bacteriophage for control of experimental Escherichia coli septicemia and meningitis in chickens and calves. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1998;5:294-8.
  69. Watanabe R, Matsumoto T, Sano G, Ishii Y, Tateda K, Sumiyama Y, et al. Efficacy of bacteriophage therapy against gut-derived sepsis caused by Pseudomonas aeru- ginosa in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:446-52. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.00635-06. · DOI
  70. Matsuzaki S, Yasuda M, Nishikawa H, Kuroda M, Ujihara T, Shuin T, et al. Experimental protection of mice against lethal Staphylococcus aureus infection by novel bacteriophage phi MR11. J Infect Dis 2003;187:613-24. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/374001. · DOI
  71. Tsonos J, Vandenheuvel D, Briers Y, De Greve H, Hernalsteens JP, Lavigne R. Hurdles in bacteriophage therapy: Deconstructing the parameters. Vet Microbiol 2014;171:460-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.001. · DOI
  72. Wagenaar JA, Bergen MAPV, Mueller MA, Wassenaar TM, Carlton RM. Phage therapy reduces Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broilers. Vet Microbiol 2005;109:275-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.06.002. · DOI
  73. Andreatti Filho RL, Higgins JP, Higgins SE, Gaona G, Wolfenden AD, Tellez G, et al. Ability of bacteriophages isolated from different sources to reduce Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis in vitro and in vivo. Poult Sci 2007;86:1904-9.
  74. Stanford K, Niu YD, Johnson R. Oral delivery systems for encapsulated bacter- iophages targeted at Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feedlot cattle. J Food Prot 2010;73:1304-12.
  75. Nale JY, Spencer J, Hargreaves KR, Buckley AM, Trzepin P, Douce GR, et al. Bacteriophage combinations significantly reduce Clostridium difficile growth in vitro and proliferation in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:968-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01774-15.Address. · DOI
  76. Colom J, Cano-Sarabia M, Otero J, Cortés P, Maspoch D, Llagostera M. Liposome- encapsulated bacteriophages for enhanced oral phage therapy against Salmonella spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:4841-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM. 00812-15. · DOI
  77. Colom J, Cano-Sarabia M, Otero J, Aríñez-Soriano J, Cortés P, Maspoch D, et al. Microencapsulation with alginate/CaCO3: a strategy for improved phage therapy. Sci Rep 2017;7:41441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41441. · DOI
  78. Zhang JY, Kraft BL, Pan YY, Wall SK, Saez AC, Ebner PD. Development of an Anti- Salmonella Phage Cocktail with Increased Host Range. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2010;7:1415-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0621. · DOI
  79. Bardina C, Spricigo DA, Cortés P, Llagostera M. Significance of the bacteriophage treatment schedule in reducing salmonella colonization of poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:6600-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01257-12. · DOI
  80. Teixeira AP, Oliveira R, Alves PM, Carrondo MJT. Advances in on-line monitoring and control of mammalian cell cultures: supporting the PAT initiative. Biotechnol Adv 2009;27:726-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.003. · DOI
  81. Chibani-Chennoufi S, Sidoti J, Bruttin A, Kutter E, Sarker S, Bru H. In vitro and in vivo bacteriolytic activities of Escherichia coli phages: implications for phage therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:2558-69. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1128/AAC.48.7.2558. · DOI
  82. Delbruck M. The growth of bacteriophage and lysis of the host. J Gen Physiol 1940;23:643-60.
  83. Abedon ST. Lysis from without. Bacteriophage 2011;1:46-9. http://dx.doi.org/10. 4161/bact.1.1.13980. · DOI
  84. Denou E, Bruttin A, Barretto C, Ngom-Bru C, Brüssow H, Zuber S. T4 phages against Escherichia coli diarrhea: potential and problems. Virology 2009;388:21-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.009. · DOI
  85. Schmerer M, Molineux IJ, Bull JJ. Synergy as a rationale for phage therapy using phage cocktails. PeerJ 2014;2:e590. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.590. · DOI
  86. Vandenheuvel D, Lavigne R, Brussow H. Bacteriophage therapy: advances in for- umulation strategies and human clinical trials. Annu Rev Virol 2015;2:599-618.
  87. Kucharewicz-Krukowska A, Slopek S. Immunogenic effect of bactriophage in pa- tients subjected to phage therapy. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 1987;35:553-61.
  88. Huff WE, Huff GR, Rath NC, Balog JM, Donoghue AM. Prevention of Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens with a bacteriophage aerosol spray. Poult Sci 2002;81:1486-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1486. · DOI
  89. Semler DD, Goudie AD, Finlay WH, Dennis JJ. Aerosol phage therapy efficacy in Burkholderia cepacia complex respiratory infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:4005-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02388-13. · DOI
  90. Oliveira A, Sereno R, Nicolau A, Azeredo J. The influence of the mode of admin- istration in the dissemination of three coliphages in chickens. Poult Sci 2009;88:728-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00378. · DOI
  91. Cano V, March C, Insua JL, Aguiló N, Llobet E, Moranta D, et al. Klebsiella pneu- moniae survives within macrophages by avoiding delivery to lysosomes. Cell Microbiol 2015;17:1537-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12466. · DOI
  92. Fumagalli O, Tall BD, Schipper C, Oelschlaeger TA. N-glycosylated proteins are involved in efficient internalization of Klebsiella pneumoniae by cultured human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 1997;65:4445-51.
  93. Singla S, Harjai K, Katare OP, Chhibber S. Encapsulation of bacteriophage in li- posome accentuates its entry in to macrophage and shields it from neutralizing antibodies. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0153777. · DOI
  94. Fish R, Kutter E, Wheat G, Blasdel B, Kutateladze M, Kuhl S. Bacteriophage treatment of intransigent diabetic toe ulcers: a case series. J Wound Care 2016;25:S27-33.
  95. Wright A, Hawkins CH, Änggård EE, Harper DR. A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:349-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01973.x. · DOI
  96. Merabishvili M, Pirnay J, Verbeken G, Chanishvili N, Tediashvili M, Lashkhi N, et al. Quality-controlled small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human clinical trials. PLoS One 2009;4:1-10.
  97. Rose T, Verbeken G, De Vos D, Merabishvili M, Vaneechoutte M, Jennes S, et al. Experimental phage therapy of burn wound infection: difficult first steps. Int J Burn Trauma 2014;4:66-73.
  98. Puapermpoonsiri U, Spencer J, van der Walle CF. A freeze-dried formulation of bacteriophage encapsulated in biodegradable microspheres. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;72:26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.12.001. · DOI
  99. Lee SW, Belcher AM. Virus-based fabrication of micro-and nanofibers using electrospinning. Nano Lett 2004;4:387-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl034911t. · DOI
  100. Briers Y, Miroshnikov K, Chertkov O, Nekrasov A, Mesyanzhinov V, Volckaert G, et al. The structural peptidoglycan hydrolase gp181 of bacteriophage phiKZ. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;374:747-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. bbrc.2008.07.102. · DOI
  101. Knezevic P, Obreht D, Curcin S, Petrusic M, Aleksic V, Kostanjsek R, et al. Phages of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: response to environmental factors and in vitro ability to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation. J Appl Microbiol 2011;111:245-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05043.x. · DOI
  102. Leung SSY, Parumasivam T, Gao FG, Carrigy NB, Vehring R, Finlay WH, et al. Production of inhalation phage powders using spray freeze drying and spray drying techniques for treatment of respiratory infections. Pharm Res 2016;33:1486-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-1892-6. · DOI
  103. Dini C, de Urraza PJ. Effect of buffer systems and disaccharides concentration on Podoviridae coliphage stability during freeze drying and storage. Cryobiology 2013;66:339-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.03.007. · DOI
  104. Korehei R, Kadla J. Incorporation of T4 bacteriophage in electrospun fibres. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1425-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.12158. · DOI
  105. Clark WA. Comparison of several methods for preserving bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol 1962;10:466-71.
  106. Davies JD, Kelly MJ. The preservation of bacteriophage H1 of Corynebacterium ulcerans U103 by freeze-drying. J Hyg (Lond) 1969;67:573-83. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/S0022172400042030. · DOI
  107. Ackermann H-W, Tremblay D, Moineau S. Long-term bacteriophage preservation. WFCC Newsl 2004;38:35-40.
  108. Wang W. Lyophilization and development of solid protein pharmaceuticals. vol. 203. 2000; 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00423-3. · DOI
  109. Telko MJ, Hickey AJ. Dry powder inhaler formulation. Respir Care 2005;50:1209-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-200615470-00016. · DOI
  110. Engel HWB, Smith D, Berwald LG. The preservation of mycobacteriophages by means of freeze drying. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974;109:561-6.
  111. Merabishvili M, Vervaet C, Pirnay JP, de Vos D, Verbeken G, Mast J, et al. Stability of Staphylococcus aureus phage ISP after freeze-drying (lyophilization). PLoS One 2013;8:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068797. · DOI
  112. Malenovská H. The influence of stabilizers and rates of freezing on preserving of structurally different animal viruses during lyophilization and subsequent storage. J Appl Microbiol 2014;117:1810-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.12654. · DOI
  113. Golshahi L, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Finlay WH. In vitro lung delivery of bacter- iophages KS4-M and φKZ using dry powder inhalers for treatment of Burkholderia cepacia complex and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis. J Appl Microbiol 2010;110:106-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010. 04863.x. · DOI
  114. Puapermpoonsiri U, Ford SJ, van der Walle CF. Stabilization of bacteriophage during freeze drying. Int J Pharm 2010;389:168-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpharm.2010.01.034. · DOI
  115. Dai M, Senecal A, Nugen SR. Electrospun water-soluble polymer nanofibers for the dehydration and storage of sensitive reagents. Nanotechnology 2014;25:225101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/22/225101. · DOI
  116. Cox CS, Harris WJ, Lee J. Viability and electron microscope studies of phages T3 and T7 subjected to freeze-drying, freeze-thawing and aerosolization. J Gen Microbiol 1974;81:207-15.
  117. Leung SSY, Parumasivam T, Gao FG, Carrigy NB, Vehring R, Finlay WH, et al. Effects of storage conditions on the stability of spray dried, inhalable bacter- iophage powders. Int J Pharm 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017. 01.060. · DOI
  118. Markoishvili K, Tsitlanadze G, Katsarava R, Morris JG, Sulakvelidze A. A novel sustained-release matrix based on biodegradable poly(ester amide)s and im- pregnated with bacteriophages and an antibiotic shows promise in management of infected venous stasis ulcers and other poorly healing wounds. Int J Dermatol 2002;41:453-8.
  119. Dini C, Islan GA, de Urraza PJ, Castro GR. Novel biopolymer matrices for micro- encapsulation of phages: enhanced protection against acidity and protease ac- tivity. Macromol Biosci 2012;12:1200-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi. 201200109. · DOI
  120. Alfadhel M, Puapermpoonsiri U, Ford SJ, McInnes FJ, Van Der Walle CF. Lyophilized inserts for nasal administration harboring bacteriophage selective for Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm 2011;416:280-7. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.006. · DOI
  121. Hoe S, Ivey JW, Boraey MA, Shamsaddini-Shahrbabak A, Javaheri E, Matinkhoo S, et al. Use of a fundamental approach to spray-drying formulation design to fa- cilitate the development of multi-component dry powder aerosols for respiratory drug delivery. Pharm Res 2014;31:449-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095- 013-1174-5. · DOI
  122. Chew NYK, Chan HK. The role of particle properties in pharmaceutical powder inhalation formulations. J Aerosol Med 2002;15:325-30.
  123. Klingler C, Müller BW, Steckel H. Insulin-micro-and nanoparticles for pulmonary delivery. Int J Pharm 2009;377:173-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm. 2009.05.008. · DOI
  124. Weers J. Inhaled antimicrobial therapy -barriers to effective treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015;85:24-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.013. · DOI
  125. Vandenheuvel D, Singh A, Vandersteegen K, Klumpp J, Lavigne R, Van Den Mooter G. Feasibility of spray drying bacteriophages into respirable powders to combat pulmonary bacterial infections. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;84:578-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.12.022. · DOI
  126. Jończyk E, Kłak M, Międzybrodzki R, Górski A. The influence of external factors on bacteriophages-review. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2011;56:191-200. http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s12223-011-0039-8. · DOI
  127. Matinkhoo S, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Finlay WH, Vehring R. Spray-dried respirable powders containing bacteriophages for the treatment of pulmonary infections. J Pharm Sci 2011;100:5197-205.
  128. Vandenheuvel D, Meeus J, Lavigne R, Van Den Mooter G. Instability of bacter- iophages in spray-dried trehalose powders is caused by crystallization of the ma- trix. Int J Pharm 2014;472:202-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06. 026. · DOI
  129. Crowe LM, Reid DS, Crowe JH. Is trehalose special for preserving dry biomater- ials? Biophys J 1996;71:2087-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96) 79407-9. · DOI
  130. Steckel H, Bolzen N. Alternative sugars as potential carriers for dry powder in- halations. Int J Pharm 2004;270:297-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm. 2003.10.039. · DOI
  131. Wong Y-L, Sampson S, Germishuizen WA, Goonesekera S, Caponetti G, Sadoff J, et al. Drying a tuberculosis vaccine without freezing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:2591-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611430104. · DOI
  132. Sahota JS, Smith CM, Radhakrishnan P, Winstanley C, Goderdzishvili M, Chanishvili N, et al. Bacteriophage delivery by nebulization and efficacy against phenotypically diverse Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2015;28:353-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp. 2014.1172. · DOI
  133. Golshahi L, Seed KD, Dennis JJ, Finlay WH. Toward modern inhalational bacter- iophage therapy: nebulization of bacteriophages of Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2008;21:351-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp. 2008.0701. · DOI
  134. Prouty CC. Storage of the bacteriophage of the lactic acid streptococci in the de- siccated state with observations on longevity. Appl Microbiol 1953;1:250-1.
  135. Ibekwe VC, Fadda HM, McConnell EL, Khela MK, Evans DF, Basit AW. Interplay between intestinal pH, transit time and feed status on the in vivo performance of pH responsive ileo-colonic release systems. Pharm Res 2008;25:1828-35. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-008-9580-9. · DOI
  136. McConnell EL, Fadda HM, Basit AW. Gut instincts: explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2008;364:213-26. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.05.012. · DOI
  137. Esteban PP, Alves DR, Enright MC, Bean JE, Gaudion A, Jenkins ATA, et al. Enhancement of the antimicrobial properties of bacteriophage-K via stabilization using oil-in-water nano-emulsions. Biotechnol Prog 2014;30:932-44. http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1898. · DOI
  138. Ma Y, Pacan JC, Wang Q, Xu Y, Huang X, Korenevsky A, et al. Microencapsulation of bacteriophage Felix O1 into chitosan-alginate microspheres for oral delivery. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:4799-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM. 00246-08. · DOI
  139. Gul O, Dervisoglu M. Application of multicriteria decision technique to determine optimum sodium alginate concentration for microencapsulation of Lactobacillus casei Shirota by extrusion and emulsification. J Food Process Eng 2017;40:1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12481. · DOI
  140. Ma Y, Pacan JC, Wang Q, Sabour PM, Huang X, Xu Y. Enhanced alginate micro- spheres as means of oral delivery of bacteriophage for reducing Staphylococcus aureus intestinal carriage. Food Hydrocoll 2012;26:434-40. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.foodhyd.2010.11.017. · DOI
  141. Lotfipour F, Mirzaeei S, Maghsoodi M. Preparation and characterization of algi- nate and psyllium beads containing Lactobacillus acidophilus. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:680108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/ 680108. · DOI
  142. Hathaway H, Alves DR, Bean J, Esteban PP, Ouadi K, Sutton JM, et al. Poly (N- isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) (PNIPAM-co-ALA) nanospheres for the ther- mally triggered release of Bacteriophage K. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015;96:437-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.09.013. · DOI
  143. Bean JE, Alves DR, Laabei M, Esteban PP, Thet NT, Enright MC, et al. Triggered release of bacteriophage K from agarose/hyaluronan hydrogel matrixes by Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors. Chem Mater 2014;26:7201-8.
  144. Samtlebe M, Ergin F, Wagner N, Neve H, Küçükçetin A, Franz CMAP, et al. Carrier systems for bacteriophages to supplement food systems: encapsulation and con- trolled release to modulate the human gut microbiota. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2016;68:334-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.039. · DOI
  145. Nieth A, Verseux C, Barnert S, Süss R, Römer W, Nieth A, et al. A first step toward liposome-mediated intracellular bacteriophage therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2015;12:1411-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.1043125. · DOI
  146. Salalha W, Kuhn J, Dror Y, Zussman E. Encapsulation of bacteria and viruses in electrospun nanofibres. Nanotechnology 2006;17:4657-81. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/0957-4484/17/18/025. · DOI
  147. Korehei R, Kadla JF. Encapsulation of T4 bacteriophage in electrospun poly (ethylene oxide)/cellulose diacetate fibers. Carbohydr Polym 2014;100:150-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.079. · DOI
  148. Vonasek E, Le P, Nitin N. Encapsulation of bacteriophages in whey protein films for extended storage and release. Food Hydrocoll 2014;37:7-13. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.017. · DOI
  149. Lone A, Anany H, Hakeem M, Aguis L, Avdjian AC, Bouget M, et al. Development of prototypes of bioactive packaging materials based on immobilized bacter- iophages for control of growth of bacterial pathogens in foods. Int J Food Microbiol 2016;217:49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.10. 011. · DOI
  150. Kaikabo AA, AbdulKarim SM, Abas F. Evaluation of the efficacy of chitosan na- noparticles loaded FKAZ14 bacteriophage in the biological control of colibacillosis in chickens. Poult Sci 2017;96:295-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew255. · DOI
  151. Tang Z, Huang X, Baxi S, Chambers JR, Sabour PM, Wang Q. Whey protein im- proves survival and release characteristics of bacteriophage Felix O1 encapsulated in alginate microspheres. Food Res Int 2013;52:460-6. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.foodres.2012.12.037. · DOI
  152. Kim S, Jo A, Ahn J. Application of chitosan-alginate microspheres for the sus- tained release of bacteriophage in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Int J Food Sci Technol 2015;50:913-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12736. · DOI
  153. Tang Z, Huang X, Sabour PM, Chambers JR, Wang Q. Preparation and char- acterization of dry powder bacteriophage K for intestinal delivery through oral administration. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2015;60:263-70. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.lwt.2014.08.012. · DOI
  154. Govender M, Choonara YE, Van Vuuren S, Kumar P, Du Toit LC, Pillay VA. A gastro-resistant ovalbumin bi-layered mini-tablet-in-tablet system for the delivery of Lactobacillus acidophilus probiotic to simulated human intestinal and colon conditions. J Pharm Pharmacol 2015;67:939-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphp. 12389. · DOI
  155. Katsarava R, Beridze V, Arabuli N, Kharadze D, Chu CC, Won CY. Amino Acid- Based Bioanalogous Polymers. Synthesis, and Study of Regular Poly(ester amide)s Based on Bis(alpha-amino acid) alpha,omega-Alkylene Diesters, and Aliphatic Dicarboxylic Acids. J Polym Sci: Part A: Polym Chem 1999;37:391-407.
  156. Davis SS, Hardy JG, Fara JW. Transit of pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut 1986;27:886-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.27.8.886. · DOI
  157. Davis SS, Illum L, Hinchcliffe M. Gastrointestinal transit of dosage forms in the pig. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;53:33-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1211/ 0022357011775163. · DOI
  158. Uriot O, Galia W, Awussi AA, Perrin C, Denis S, Chalancon S, et al. Use of the dynamic gastro-intestinal model TIM to explore the survival of the yogurt bac- terium Streptococcus thermophilus and the metabolic activities induced in the si- mulated human gut. Food Microbiol 2016;53:18-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fm.2015.05.007. · DOI
  159. Philip AK, Philip B. Colon targeted drug delivery systems: a review on primary and novel approaches. Oman Med J 2010;25:79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj. 2010.24. · DOI
  160. Choonara BF, Choonara YE, Kumar P, Bijukumar D, du Toit LC, Pillay V. A review of advanced oral drug delivery technologies facilitating the protection and ab- sorption of protein and peptide molecules. Biotechnol Adv 2014;32:1269-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.006. · DOI
  161. Amidon S, Brown JE, Dave VS. Colon-targeted oral drug delivery systems: design trends and approaches. AAPS PharmSciTech 2015;16:731-41. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1208/s12249-015-0350-9. · DOI
  162. Van Citters GW, Lin HC. Ileal brake: neuropeptidergic control of intestinal transit. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2006;8:367-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894-006- 0021-9. · DOI
  163. Hua S, Marks E, Schneider JJ, Keely S. Advances in oral nano-delivery systems for colon targeted drug delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: selective targeting to diseased versus healthy tissue. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2015;11:1117-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.02.018. · DOI
  164. Inman LR, Cantey JR. Specific adherence of Escherichia coli (strain RDEC-1) to membranous (M) cells of the Peyer's patch in Escherichia coli diarrhea in the rabbit. J Clin Invest 1983;71:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI110737. · DOI
  165. Pappo J, Ermak TH, Steger HJ. Monoclonal antibody-directed targeting of fluor- escent polystyrene microspheres to Peyer's patch M cells. Immunology 1991;73:277-80.
  166. Shakweh M, Ponchel G, Fattal E. Particle uptake by Peyer's patches: a pathway for drug and vaccine delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005;1:141-63.
  167. George M, Abraham TE. Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: alginate and chitosan -a review. J Control Release 2006;114:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.017. · DOI · Paper page
  168. Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J. Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: the gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012;64:557-70. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.009. · DOI
  169. Lai SK, Wang YY, Hanes J. Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to mucosal tissues. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009;61:158-71. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.11.002. · DOI
  170. Jain D, Panda AK, Majumdar DK. Eudragit S100 entrapped insulin microspheres for oral delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 2005;6:E100-7. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1208/pt060116. · DOI
  171. Silva CM, Ribeiro AJ, Ferreira D, Veiga F. Insulin encapsulation in reinforced al- ginate microspheres prepared by internal gelation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2006;29:148-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2006.06.008. · DOI
  172. Kietzmann D, Moulari B, Béduneau A, Pellequer Y, Lamprecht A. Colonic delivery of carboxyfluorescein by pH-sensitive microspheres in experimental colitis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;76:290-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.06.013. · DOI
  173. Chawla A, Sharma P, Pawar P. Eudragit S-100 coated sodium alginate micro- spheres of naproxen sodium: formulation, optimization and in vitro evaluation. Acta Pharm 2012;62:529-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10007-012-0034-x. · DOI
  174. De Arce Velasquez A, Ferreira LM, Stangarlin MFL, Da Silva CDB, Rolim CMB, Cruz L. Novel Pullulan-Eudragit S100 blend microparticles for oral delivery of risedronate: formulation, in vitro evaluation and tableting of blend microparticles. Mater Sci Eng C 2014;38:212-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.003. · DOI
  175. Stuart M a C, WTS Huck, Genzer J, Müller M, Ober C, Stamm M, et al. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 2010;9:101-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2614. · DOI
  176. Lautenschläger C, Schmidt C, Fischer D, Stallmach A. Drug delivery strategies in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014;71:58-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.10.001. · DOI
  177. de Souza DF, Goebel K, Andreazza IF. Development of enteric coated sustained release minitablets containing mesalamine. Braz J Pharm Sci 2013;49:529-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502013000300014. · DOI
  178. Sekirov I, Russell S, Antunes L. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2010;90:859-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00045.2009. · DOI · Paper page
  179. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, et al. Host-Gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012;336:1262-8.
  180. Mountzouris KC, Tsirtsikos P, Kalamara E, Nitsch S, Schatzmayr G, Fegeros K. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and mod- ulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult Sci 2007;86:309-17.
  181. Hovgaard L, Brondsted H. Current applications of polysaccharides in colon tar- geting. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1996;13:185-223.
  182. Vandamme TF, Lenourry A, Charrueau C, Chaumeil JC. The use of polysaccharides to target drugs to the colon. Carbohydr Polym 2002;48:219-31. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00263-6. · DOI
  183. Lorenzo-Lamosa ML, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Design of mi- croencapsulated chitosan microspheres for colonic drug delivery. J Control Release 1998;52:109-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00203-4. · DOI
  184. Calinescu C, Mateescu MA. Carboxymethyl high amylose starch: chitosan self- stabilized matrix for probiotic colon delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;70:582-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.006. · DOI
  185. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Humenberger C, Valenta C. Basic studies on bioadhesive delivery systems for peptide and protein drugs. Int J Pharm 1998;165:217-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00017-9. · DOI
  186. Thanou M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE. Chitosan and its derivatives as intestinal absorption enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;50:91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0169-409X(01)00180-6. · DOI
  187. Van der Lubben IM, Verhoef JC, Borchard G, Junginger HE. Chitosan and its de- rivatives in mucosal drug and vaccine delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;14:201-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00172-5. · DOI
  188. Lameiro MH, Malpique R, Silva AC, Alves PM, Melo E. Encapsulation of adenoviral vectors into chitosan-bile salt microparticles for mucosal vaccination. J Biotechnol 2006;126:152-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.04.030. · DOI
  189. Takeuchi H, Matsui Y, Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. Effectiveness of submicron-sized, chitosan-coated liposomes in oral administration of peptide drugs. Int J Pharm 2005;303:160-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005. 06.028. · DOI
  190. Thirawong N, Thongborisute J, Takeuchi H, Sriamornsak P. Improved intestinal absorption of calcitonin by mucoadhesive delivery of novel pectin-liposome na- nocomplexes. J Control Release 2008;125:236-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jconrel.2007.10.023. · DOI
  191. Shi L, Li Z, Li D, Xu M, Chen H, Zhang Z, et al. Encapsulation of probiotic Lactobacillus bulgaricus in alginate-milk microspheres and evaluation of the sur- vival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J Food Eng 2013;117:99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.02.012. · DOI
  192. Matsubara T, Emoto W, Kawashiro K. A simple two-transition model for loss of infectivity of phages on exposure to organic solvent. Biomol Eng 2007;24:269-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.02.002. · DOI
  193. Olofsson L, Ankarloo J, Andersson PO, Nicholls IA. Filamentous bacteriophage stability in non-aqueous media. Chem Biol 2001;8:661-71. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S1074-5521(01)00041-2. · DOI
  194. Milo S, Thet NT, Liu D, Nzakizwanayo J, Jones BV, Jenkins ATA. An in-situ in- fection detection sensor coating for urinary catheters. Biosens Bioelectron 2016;81:166-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.059. · DOI
  195. Weinberger A, Tsai FC, Koenderink GH, Schmidt TF, Itri R, Meier W, et al. Gel- assisted formation of giant unilamellar vesicles. Biophys J 2013;105:154-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.024. · DOI
  196. Pautot S, Frisken BJ, Weitz DA. Engineering asymmetric vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003;100:10718-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1931005100. · DOI
  197. Balcao VM, Glasser CA, Chaud MV, del Fiol FS, Tubino M, Vila MMDC. Biomimetic aqueous-core lipid nanoballoons integrating a multiple emulsion formulation: a suitable housing system for viable lytic bacteriophages. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2014;123:478-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09. 045. · DOI
  198. Xiao B, Laroui H, Ayyadurai S, Viennois E, Charania MA, Zhang Y, et al. Mannosylated bioreducible nanoparticle-mediated macrophage-specific TNF- alpha RNA interference for IBD therapy. Biomaterials 2013;34:7471-82. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.008. · DOI
  199. Pichai MVA, Ferguson LR. Potential prospects of nanomedicine for targeted therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:2895-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2895. · DOI
  200. Schmidt C, Lautenschlaeger C, Collnot EM, Schumann M, Bojarski C, Schulzke JD, et al. Nano-and microscaled particles for drug targeting to inflamed intestinal mucosa -a first in vivo study in human patients. J Control Release 2013;165:139-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.10.019. · DOI

200 of 238 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, D. J., Sokolov, I. J., Vinner, G. K., Mancuso, F., Cinquerrui, S., Vladisavljevic, G. T., Clokie, M. R. J., Garton, N. J., Stapley, A. G. F., & Kirpichnikova, A.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Liverpool Hope University (GB)
Corresponding author
Malik, Danish J.
Venue
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
249
Pages
100-133
ISSN
0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613205665
Cited by
594
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hope's Institutional Research Archive (Liverpool Hope University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
EPSRC (EP/M027341/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
bacteriophages, phage therapy, phage formulation, phage encapsulation, phage cocktail, freeze-drying, spray drying, emulsions, polymeric microparticles, nanoparticles, liposomes, stimuli-responsive drug delivery, sustained drug release, antibiotic resistance, systemic infection, intracellular infection, prophylaxis
MeSH terms
Phage Therapy, Animals, Antibiosis, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Bacteriophages, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Compounding, Freeze Drying, Humans, Liposomes, Virus Assembly, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review