Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some Thoughts on Bacterial Classification

Sneath, P. H. A.·1957·Journal of General Microbiology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Scientific classification is virtually a branch of mathematics which describes the overall similarities of organisms. Catalogues do not do this. Many schemes of bacterial taxonomy are not classifications but catalogues. Similarity is best measured by the number of features in common between two strains, while division into taxa is based on correlated features. Other criteria for these two basic ideas are unsatisfactory and cause confusion, and there seems to be no logical reason why any one feature should be given greater weight in classification than any other. Hierarchical systems are a practical necessity, and simple mathematical methods are useful in bacterial classification. It is not necessary to know the evolutionary history of organisms in order to classify them in a scientific manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-17-1-184

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Sneath, P. H. A.
Venue
Journal of General Microbiology
Published
1957-08-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
184-200
ISSN
0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963752964
Cited by
319
References
0
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Thoughts on Bacterial Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-17-1-184
The paper
Sneath, P. H. A. (1957). Some Thoughts on Bacterial Classification. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-17-1-184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.