The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Growth of Micro-organisms in Relation to their Energy Supply
Abstract
Summary: When Streptococcus faecalis was grown anaerobically in a complex medium containing d-glucose, d-ribose or l-arginine as energy source the dry wt. of organism produced was proportional to the concentration of the energy source in the medium. However, S. faecalis will not grow in a defined medium with arginine as the energy source unless glucose is present at the same time. The anaerobic growth of both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pseudomonas lindneri was proportional to the concentration of glucose in the medium and the yield coefficient—defined as g. dry wt. organism/mole glucose—of the former was the same as that of S. faecalis grown upon glucose and approximately twice that of P. lindneri. Calculation of the g. dry wt. organism/mole adenosine triphosphate synthesized for these three organisms gave values ranging from 12·6 to 8·3 with an average of 10·5. These results suggest that, under anaerobic conditions, the yield of S. faecalis, S. cerevisiae and P. lindneri was proportional to the amount of ATP synthesized. When Propionibacterium pentosaceum was grown anaerobically with glucose, glycerol or dl-lactate as energy source there was, in all three cases, a linear relationship between the dry wt. of organisms produced and the concentration of the energy source in the medium. The values of the yield coefficients obtained were compatible with the formation of approximately 4 mole ATP/mole glucose, 2 mole ATP/mole glycerol and 1 mole ATP/mole lactate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis a quantitative approach
De Vries, F. W. T. P., Brunsting, A. H. M., & Van Laar, H. H. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2 · Cited by 914
Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions
Russell, J. B., & Cook, G. M. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.48-62.1995 · Cited by 927
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822
Swings, J., & De Ley, J. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.1-46.1977 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- BAUCHOP, T., & ELSDEN, S. R.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1960-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-469
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2121287972
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Growth of Micro-organisms in Relation to their Energy Supply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-23-3-457
- The paper
- BAUCHOP, T., & ELSDEN, S. R. (1960). The Growth of Micro-organisms in Relation to their Energy Supply. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-23-3-457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.